Criminal jurisdiction in Indian country is relatively settled. As a general matter, federal statutes look to the nature of the offense, the location of the offense, and the Indian or non-Indian status of the offender and victim in allocating criminal jurisdiction among federal, state, and tribal authoritiess. In a number of states, the allocation scheme has been supplanted, in whole or in part, by federal statutes authorizing state assumption of jurisdiction over some or all crimes within Indian country. Outside Indian country, Indians are subject to state criminal jurisdiction to the same extent as non-Indians, but treaty provisions, particularly those securing hunting and fishing rights, may exempt certain activities from full application of state law.
This chapter discusses the significant federal statutes governing crimes committed in Indian country and associated decisional authority, the principles governing the respective bounds of tribal and state jurisdiction, and, finally, special questions of jurisdiction, including liquor-related offenses, juvenile offenses, and state authority to effect arrests of Indians within Indian country for offenses committed elsewhere. The discussion in Chapter 2 concerning the terms “Indian” and “Indian country” applies when determining whether criminal conduct has occurred within Indian country and whether the defendant or any victim is an Indian. 1____________________
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: American Indian Law Deskbook. Contributors: Hardy Myers - Author, Clay Smith - Editor. Publisher: University Press of Colorado. Place of publication: Boulder, CO. Publication year: 2004. Page number: 110.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.