Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Discovery of Kepler's Laws: The Interaction of Science, Philosophy, and Religion

By: Job S. J. Kozhamthadam | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 1
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

INTRODUCTION

Despite having extreme interest and importance, the nature of scientific discovery has always been elusive and has remained an unsolved philosophico-scientific problem. How do scientists make their discoveries? Is there a logic of scientific discovery? If so, what is it? If not, then how can scientific discovery differ from luck or witchcraft? Again, what factors are involved in scientific discovery? Do extrascientific concerns, especially philosophical and religious principles, have a role to play? What specifically is that role? A detailed and in-depth study of Kepler's discovery of the first two laws of planetary motion, this book attempts to throw light on the above questions and related ones.

Perhaps no other case of scientific discovery is so interesting and enlightening as that of Kepler's laws. This is so not only because his laws are among the first ones discovered in modern science, but also because he has left extensive and candid 1 reports on the various paths he took in his journey toward these laws (except for the third law).

A scientific discovery can be divided into two stages or steps: (1) the initial "thinking up" of the idea, and (2) the eventual establishment of the idea. The present study examines both stages. According to some writers, the first step cannot have a logic or rationality, which seems to imply that hypotheses originate in a rational vacuum. Many contemporary philosophers of science oppose

-1-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 316
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?