The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution

By Craig M. Bradley | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Chapter 1
Before the Revolution

Until the 1960s, the concept of "criminal procedure" did not have the same meaning that it does today. There was no law school course by that name; at best, some observations about the topic were tacked onto a course in criminal law. "Criminal procedure" generally meant the formal, legal procedure of the criminal justice system from arrest through sentencing. Thus, if one looks to rules of "criminal procedure" such as the American Law Institute's model rules adopted in 1930, one finds no mention of searches, interrogations, or police identification procedures.1 What we think of as the very essence of the subject today was completely ignored. Because these matters took place outside the formal system of justice, lawyers and judges were oblivious to them. The common law rule was that "it matters not how you get [evidence]; if you steal it even, it would be admissible in [court]."2 This non-exclusionary policy divorced the courts from the evidence gathering process. "Criminal procedure" was a matter for the courts. "Evidence gathering" was a matter for the police.

The problem with this policy of apartheid was that it was difficult to reconcile with federal and state constitutional provisions forbidding unreasonable searches and seizures and requiring that criminal defendants be accorded "equal protection" and "due process of law."* These constitutional guarantees caused the Supreme Court to make its first tentative explorations of what had heretofore been the constitutional terra incognita of police procedures. But before the Court

The fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution provides, in pertinent part: "[No State shall] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws."


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 270

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?