Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Atrocities on Trial: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Prosecuting War Crimes

By: Patricia Heberer; Jürgen Matthäus | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 211
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Tainted Law
The West German Judiciary and
the Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals

REBECCA WITTMANN

When we think of trials of Nazi criminals, two major proceedings come immediately to mind: the Nuremberg Trial of the Major War Criminals in 1945 and the Eichmann Trial in 1961. Both trials were public affairs, and both affected how the international community deals with war crimes and crimes against humanity now. It is surprising to many to discover that in West Germany an enormous number of Nazi-and regime-supporting defendants were brought to trial—over 6,000, in fact. Many more—about 100,000—were investigated but never tried. The defendants sat in court accused not of crimes against humanity but of regular murder, as defined by the German penal code in 1871. In this essay I would like to shed light on these trials, and particularly on the extraordinary difficulty prosecutors had in bringing former Nazis to trial, in getting them convicted, and, finally, in ensuring that they served their sentences in full.

Focusing on the period between 1960 and 1980, I argue that there was a massive divide between the young and eager prosecutors and the older, more conservative, largely former Nazi judiciary. There is no clear-cut picture of complicit jurists; in nearly every state in West Germany there was a young, committed, and probing prosecution. But they had to work within a system that was defined by the generation of jurists who had come before them and who still wielded extraordinary influence over the West German judicial system; in some states, 100 percent of Nazi judges had maintained or returned to their former posts. These judges sent a message to the public—through their interpretation of the laws—that the Nazi past was being dealt with properly. They developed the notion of the middleman as neutral, and therefore innocent; this representation of Nazi crime, reinforced time and again by trial verdicts, created a society in which there was little public will to punish Nazism fully. This is what Joachim Perels has called a normalization of the ns (Nazi) system from the

-211-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 327
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?