On May 24, 2000 the Democratic Party held a fund-raiser at the MCI Center in Washington, D.C., dubbed by organizer Terry McAuliffe as a “down-home blue jeans and barbecue bash.” DNC National Chairman Joe Andrew kicked off the event by declaring, “We don't care about the size of your wallet, just the size of your heart,” and DNC General Chairman Ed Rendell proclaimed, “When we win this election in November, we are committed to getting rid of soft money. And four years from now, when we have a similar event—the top ticket is going to cost $100, and we're going to hold it in RFK Stadium.” Ironically, the Democrats raised more than $26 million that night, with nearly 50 percent of those funds raised from a handful of individual, union, and corporate soft money donors.1
In the previous chapter, I examined the patterns of hard money donated by political action committees to candidates for federal office. In the mid-1990s, however, most campaign finance reform advocates lost interest in hard money and instead focused their ire on “soft money,” those unregulated funds raised through the parties' nonfederal accounts (and at big fund-raisers like the Democrats' blue jeans bash). Congressman Marty Meehan (D-Mass.) and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) argued in 2001, for example, that “the current soft money system is a cancer on our democracy.”2 They asserted that parties were
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Choices and Changes: Interest Groups in the Electoral Process. Contributors: Michael M. Franz - Author. Publisher: Temple University Press. Place of publication: Philadelphia. Publication year: 2008. Page number: 95.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.