Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Lincoln on Race and Slavery

By: Henry Louis Gates Jr.; Donald Yacovone et al. | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 92
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

20

Speech at Springfield, Illinois:
CW, 2:403–409

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision on March 6, 1857. Scott, a Missouri slave, claimed that since his owner had taken him to Illinois and to the Minnesota Territory where slavery did not exist, his status as a slave had ended. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney concluded that Scott had no right to sue for his freedom because as a “Negro” he was not a U.S. citizen and, thus, did not enjoy benefits deriving from the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Neither the plaintiff nor any other African American, Taney explained in his famous dictum, had any “rights that white men were bound to respect.” The Court's decision not only rejected the idea of black citizenship but asserted that Congress possessed no right to ban slavery in the territories, voiding the 1820 Missouri Compromise. Nearly four months passed before Lincoln responded publicly to it. When he did so, the fighting in Kansas-Nebraska had just been put down by federal troops, and enraged Republicans across the North were denouncing the decision as a coup d'état aimed at expanding slavery and destroying their party. If the Supreme Court ruled that all property—including slaves—could be taken into the territories, how could anyone halt slavery's expansion? Ultimately, according to Lincoln, the Taney Court's decision would authorize slaveowners to take their “property” anywhere in the country, invalidating all state laws and constitutions banning slavery. The threat to American freedom, Lincoln believed, could not be greater. On June 7, Senator Douglas spoke in Springfield, praising the Court's decision as a vindication of his own stand and his controversial 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act. He then damned the Republicans as promoters of miscegenation. Lincoln could not let Douglas's dangerous opinions and salacious charges stand. His June 26 response repudiated the Taney Court's decision and unwaveringly defended the principle that all of humanity

-92-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 346
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?