The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore

By Richard L. Hasen | Go to book overview
Save to active project

4
Deferring to Political Branches
on Contested Equality Claims

Who Decides the Validity of Contested
Political Equality Measures and Why?

Voters in Missouri pass a law limiting individual campaign contributions to state officials to amounts as low as $100.1 Congress decides to suspend state-imposed literacy tests for voting in state and local elections six years after the Supreme Court holds that such tests, if fairly administered, do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.2 The New York legislature, in order to comply with the U.S. Justice Department's interpretation of the Voting Rights Act and to satisfy demands of its members to protect themselves and gain partisan advantage during the redistricting process, draws majority-minority districts that split a cohesive religious group into two districts.3

At first glance, these three actions have little in common beyond embracing the field of election law. In the first case, voters act through the initiative process to curb the role of money in elections. In the second case, Congress acts to impose a national standard for voter qualifications. In the third case, a state legislature pursues its own self-interested goals in redistricting while complying with federally imposed districting standards.

The common thread running through each action is that political actors have come together—at least arguably—to impose a contested version of political equality. There is (or was, in the case of literacy tests) no consensus or near-consensus that political equality requires very low campaign contribution limits, a ban on literacy tests in voting, or the creation of majority-minority districts.

-101-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 227

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?