Victims' Rights and Victims' Wrongs: Comparative Liability in Criminal Law

By Vera Bergelson | Go to book overview
Save to active project

2

WHY DOES CRIMINAL LAW NEED A GENERIC
DEFENSE OF COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL LIABILITY?

FAIR AND EFFICIENT PUNISHMENT

The primary reason to consider the role of the victim in the committed offense is a sense that, at least in some circumstances, it affects the liability of the perpetrator and the punishment he should receive.1 Conceptually, theories of punishment fall into two large groups, retributive and utilitarian. For a retributivist, punishment is justified because the offender deserves it; for a utilitarian, it is justified if it promotes some societal good.2


Retributivist Considerations

The dominant theory of punishment underlying Anglo-American criminal doctrine is retributivism, according to which punishment is justified by the desert of the offender. Although other goals, such as deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, may affect penal policies, it is widely recognized that “[j]uridical punishment can never be administered merely as a means of promoting another good either with regard to the criminal himself or to civil society, but must in all cases be imposed only because the individual on whom it is inflicted has committed a crime.”3 Otherwise, the state would be justified in punishing anyone, regardless of fault, as long as that brings about a net social gain.4 The priority of the “just desert” principle is not only theoretical. Research on the psychology of justice shows that the community's principles of punishment are largely retributive5 and that people explicitly name retributivism as the philosophy that should govern punishment in our society.6

In the retributive system of justice, a person may not be punished unless his wrongdoing was accompanied by a culpable mental state7 with respect to

-36-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Victims' Rights and Victims' Wrongs: Comparative Liability in Criminal Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 237

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?