Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750

By Jonathan I. Israel | Go to book overview
Save to active project

26

LEIBNIZ AND THE
RADICAL ENLIGHTENMENT

i. Early Encounters

The thinker to whom the early Aufklärung was most indebted and, according to Formey, the 'plus grand génie que l'Allemagne ait produit',1 Leibniz, was, at the same time, unsurpassed as a philosophical critic and observer of his age. He showed consummate discernment in interpreting new intellectual developments wherever in Europe they arose, often, as with his early appreciation of Locke and Newton, preceding most contemporary continental savants by decades. It is therefore of some significance in the history of ideas that Leibniz, more than any other observer of contemporary thought except perhaps Bayle, understood from the outset the wideranging implications for all mankind of the new radical philosophical movement. Committed, as he was, to upholding princely authority and religion, and eager to reunite and strengthen the Churches, Leibniz emerged as the foremost and most resolute of all the antagonists of radical thought, as well as the pre-eminent architect of the mainstream, moderate Enlightenment in Germany, Scandinavia, and Russia.

Many besides Leibniz had, by the 1670s, grasped that existing structures of belief, tradition, and control, indeed the entire prevailing religious, moral, and political system, was threatened by the upsurge of philosophical Naturalism, fatalism, and materialism, with Spinozism forming the backbone of the radical challenge. But Leibniz diverged sharply from others, such as Bossuet, Huet, Steno, Mansvelt, Maresius, Wittichius, Le Clerc, Limborch, Jaquelot, Malebranche, Lamy, Régis, and Houtteville, besides innumerable others who shared this view, in that he did not believe any of the existing alternatives could adequately defend authority, religion, and tradition, though he believed all the rival philosophical systems of his time contained grains of truth requiring careful sifting and critical reassessment. Aristotelianism, Cartesianism, Malebranchisme, Huet's and Steno's rejectionist fideism, and, later, Locke's empiricism, indeed all available alternatives, were, in his estimation, alike incapable of providing a cogent, viable, and comprehensive new framework.2

1 Formey, Mélanges philosophiques, ii, 406.

2 Leibniz, Philosophical Essays, 242–2, 255–5, 284–4; Rutherford, Leibniz, 238, 252; Ariew, 'G. W. Leibniz',
36–6.

-502-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 810

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?