Restructuring the Philadelphia Region: Metropolitan Divisions and Inequality

By Carolyn Adams; David Bartelt et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Constructing the Community Typology

Thirteen variables were used: five housing, six socioeconomic, and two household characteristics. The housing variables were percent of units built before 1940, percent of units built after 1995, percent vacant, percent detached single units, and percent owner occupied; the socioeconomic variables were percent African American, percent with less than a high school education, percent with a bachelor's degree or better, percent of persons less than 150 percent of the poverty line, percent working outside municipality of residence, and percent males unemployed; the household variables were percent of families with children under eighteen and percent of families which were female headed. Although we have spent considerable effort trying to improve the typology using measures of taxation, land use, and density, the alternatives proved statistically and intuitively inferior.

Communities were defined differently for the city and suburbs. To define communities in the city, we used the twelve planning analysis districts that the Philadelphia Planning Commission has historically used in its work; in the suburbs, the communities are the municipalities.

The validity of the typology was assessed three different ways: (1) its criterion validity was assessed using a variety of measures such as the percentage of households with incomes above $75,000; (2) the classifications were analyzed through a very different statistical methodology—a multiple discriminant analysis—using the same thirteen variables with and without random elimination of observations (the initial analysis correctly classified 91.8 percent of the cases; the random elimination analysis correctly classified 88.7); and (3) between the 2004 and 2005 reports, we sent the results of the 2004 cluster analysis to our Project Advisory Committee, county planning officials, and other regional specialists for comment. As a result, we reclassified 5 of the 364 communities for 2005, reflecting instances where group quarters distorted the classification, where there was a U.S. Census Bureau locational error, and where in a couple of instances census data did not reflect the situation “on the ground.”


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Restructuring the Philadelphia Region: Metropolitan Divisions and Inequality


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 231

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?