Psychology and Law: An Empirical Perspective

By Neil Brewer; Kipling D. Williams | Go to book overview
Save to active project

CHAPTER TWELVE
The Comprehension
of Judicial Instructions

JAMES R. P. OGLOFF

V. GORDON ROSE

The purpose of the jury is to guard against the exercise of arbi-
trary power—to make available the commonsense judgment of
the community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken
prosecutor and in preference to the professional or perhaps
over-conditioned or biased response of a judge.

Taylor v. Louisiana (1975, p. 530)

As the previous chapters on the jury process make clear, the jury—although commonly referred to as the hallmark of the legal system—plays a narrowly defined role in the legal system. Specifically, it is the role of the jury to serve as the finder of fact in the case. This task requires jurors to listen to the evidence admitted into evidence, to learn the relevant procedural and substantive law to be considered, and to arrive at a verdict. Although seemingly straightforward, this task, in practice, requires at least three unique functions of the jury. First, jurors must be able to evaluate, fairly and impartially, the evidence presented; to this end, their decisions must not be influenced, to any inappropriate extent, by "extralegal" factors such as pretrial publicity, discrimination, etc. Second, jurors must be able to comprehend the law as instructed by the judge and counsel at trial. Third, jurors must be able to systematically consider the evidence in light of the law in order to come to a verdict. The first function was evaluated in earlier chapters. Here we limit our discussion to the latter two functions: jurors' comprehension of the law (i.e., judicial instructions) and their ability to employ the law in a systematic way when deliberating to reach a verdict.

-407-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Psychology and Law: An Empirical Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 516

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?