Death by Design: Capital Punishment as Social Psychological System

By Craig Haney | Go to book overview

1

Blinded by the Death Penalty:
The Supreme Court and the Social Realities of
Capital Punishment

There have not been here only writers hungering for reality and
brilliant narrators whose "dazzling" verve carries off a man's head;
whatever the degree of guilt of the accused, there was also the
spectacle of a terror which threatens us all, that of being judged
by a power which wants to hear only the language it lends us…

—Roland Barthes, "Dominici, or the Triumph of Literature" (1972)

Historian Douglas Hay has written that the death penalty was once "the climactic emotional point of the criminal law—the moment of terror around which the system revolved."1 Although times have changed dramatically since 18th-century England, when some 200 crimes were punishable by death, this climactic emotional point still plays a central role in the administration of justice in our society. Moreover, our ambivalence about honestly and fully contemplating the "moment of terror" and everything that leads up to it often skews the way many of us talk and think about capital punishment, the way we study it, and the way our courts reason about it.

Perhaps because of a deep-seated moral and psychological ambivalence about capital punishment in our culture, many people—even some who are strongly in favor of the death penalty—find themselves saying one thing and doing another on this issue. Legal decision makers, especially, find that their support of the death penalty increasingly requires them to ignore a growing gap between many of their stated values and ideals and the patterns and practices by which they are routinely implemented in this area of law. The present chapter addresses some of these issues.

The death penalty presents American society with a mass of contradictions. In the contested terrain of capital punishment, citizens, voters, and jurors are pulled in different directions by a series of unresolved and often unnamed tensions. There is, of course, the core tension that characterizes any system of death sentencing—that, in order to demonstrate the degree to which we value human life, we take life. But there are others. Many citizens in the United States regard themselves as members of the world's most ad

-3-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Death by Design: Capital Punishment as Social Psychological System
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Series Foreword vii
  • Preface ix
  • Acknowledgments xvii
  • Contents xix
  • 1: Blinded by the Death Penalty 3
  • 2: Frameworks of Misunderstanding 27
  • 3: Constructing Capital Crimes and Defendants 45
  • 4: The Fragile Consensus 67
  • 5: A Tribunal Organized to Convict and Execute? 93
  • 6: Preparing for the Death Penalty in Advance of Trial 115
  • 7: Structural Aggravation 141
  • 8: Misguided Discretion 163
  • 9: Condemning the Other 189
  • 10: No Longer Tinkering with the Machinery of Death 211
  • Concluding Thoughts: Death Is Different 241
  • Notes 247
  • Index 323
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 329

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.