Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Child Neglect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care

By: Julie Taylor; Brigid Daniel | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 279
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Chapter 16
Intervening with Neglect
Geraldine Macdonald
'What works' credentials
Evidence-based decision-making is a demanding task, requiring much more than simply knowledge about which interventions are effective and which are not. The other chapters in this book highlight the importance of a sound knowledge of the factors contributing to neglect, the importance of high quality assessments, maintaining a child-focused approach. That said, knowing what works, and if so in what timescale, with what demands on resources, and with what chances of success in a particular set of circumstances, is essential. For the reader familiar with the literature, this chapter may appear to ignore a number of studies purporting to address effective interventions in the field. For practitioners, it may at first sight offer less than was hoped for in terms of answers to the important question 'what works?' This is because in order to be included in this summary account of 'what works?', only certain kinds of evidence have been deemed acceptable. They are, in order of evidential weight:
1. Systematic reviews, that is, reviews in which all the primary studies have been systematically identified, appraised and summarized according to an explicit and reproducible methodology (see Chapter Three).
2. Randomized controlled trial, that is, studies in which participants have been randomly allocated to receive either the intervention being evaluated or to be in a control group. The control group may have received an alternative intervention, usual services, or no services, that is, be on a waiting list.
3. Two-group studies, that is, studies in which one group of participants received the intervention being evaluated and another group (possibly matched on important characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, type or history of neglect) received one of the alternatives described in Point 2 above.

-279-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 352
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?