Jobs and Job Training: Programs and Policies
People who do not want to rely on income support programs have another option: they can try to get into a job training program or perhaps obtain a publicly created job. Yet those pursuing this alternative face many obstacles. Few programs rank as an unqualified success; the actual number of vacancies has never amounted to more than a small fraction of potential trainees, per- haps one of every twenty workers,1and the programs themselves have always targeted the poor. So, not only is it hard to get into a program and the programs help only a little, but the skills participants gain usually come with a stigma.
These difficulties share a common origin. Unlike in European countries, employment policy in the United States has never tried to match the needs of business for a labor force with the employment needs of all workers. In- stead, it has left that task to the job market, making just a modest investment in the training of workers—the "disadvantaged" and people of color—who could not find work on their own. As a consequence, although some U.S. employment programs involve workfare and many are linked to welfare, most bear the marks of a residual social policy.
In training programs, as in so many other matters, modest investments have produced modest gains: too few slots, very brief training periods, and, except for those workers who were retrained after losing well-paying jobs, salaries that rarely rose much above the poverty line. During the second
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: The Dynamics of Social Welfare Policy. Contributors: Joel Blau - Author. Publisher: Oxford University Press. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 2004. Page number: 312.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.