Neo-Confederacy: A Critical Introduction

By Euan Hague; Edward H. Sebesta et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Afterword: Nationalizing
Neo-Confederacy?

EUAN HAGUE AND EDWARD H. SEBESTA

As we were developing this manuscript in November 2004, George W. Bush was reelected president of the United States.1 Following the election results, the neo-Confederate League of the South (ls) published two maps on its web site. Under the heading "two nations?" each map showed the United States divided into blue Northern states and red Southern states, one labeled "1861" the other "2004."2 Gleefully quoting the evaluation by British journalist Simon Jenkins that the election was the "Confederates' revenge," the neoConfederates' implication was clear.3 The United States was once again "two nations." In 1861 this division had resulted in secession and the attempt by Southern states to gain independence and establish their own nation-state— why not secede once more in 2004?4

A week before the election, James Webb, writing in the Wall Street Journal, also warmed neo-Confederate hearts by identifying the "Scots-Irish" as the decisive ethnic group in the upcoming vote.5 The ls web site exuberantly proclaimed its familiar neo-Confederate message with an illustration of a sword-wielding, kilt-wearing Celtic warrior accompanying the text:

With the decline of the 20th century megastate, culture and ethnicity are
re-asserting themselves as organizing principles. So, for us, Anglo-Celtics
of the South, this probably marks the first "mainstream" recognition of this
phenomenon in the Americas.6

In his essay, Webb simplistically conflated culture and ethnicity to argue that Scots-Irish ethnic culture has produced "for 16 centuries" a "mix of fundamentalist religion and social populism," the members of this ethnic group being "tested through constant rebellions against centralized authority." Sounding like neo-Confederate ideologues Michael Hill and Thomas Flem

-309-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Neo-Confederacy: A Critical Introduction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 338

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?