Sources of the Pentateuch: Texts, Introductions, Annotations

By Antony F. Campbell; Mark A. O'brien | Go to book overview

Preface

Until recently, the source hypothesis enjoyed the status of classical certainty in most of modern biblical scholarship. For a century or so, it served to organize a mass of data into a relatively simple conceptual structure, thereby providing an overall system within which numerous other observations could be made. Its assumptions became accepted as a framework within which study of the Pentateuch proceeded.

There is great value in being able to work with a set of assumptions that simplifies the range of data in an area as vast as the Pentateuch. One can take comfort in the security of assumptions that are felt to be widely accepted and not to need constant reexamination. There is, however, a correspondingly great danger of blindness and falsehood in the complacent acceptance of simplicity and security. Comfortable as the past may have been, such complacency can no longer hold the field. The source hypothesis has been under challenge and reexamination for some years.

In situations of challenge, the temptation always exists of flight to another equally unexamined set of assumptions: out with the old, in with the new, let comfort be restored. Yielding to this temptation leaves the mass of data unexamined, the old assumptions unchallenged because untested, and the new paradigms fragile for lack of vigorous comparison.

The aim of this book is to enable assumptions about the Pentateuch to be vigorously and thoroughly challenged. We do not set out to advocate a source-critical model for the Pentateuch. We do set out to present one example of a source-critical model as clearly and intelligibly as possible. For this purpose, we have chosen Martin Noth’s view of the sources in the source hypothesis, as presented in his History of Pentateuchal Traditions.1

A successful challenge to any scholarly position must always confront the opposition in its strongest form. Anything less is unworthy and unproductive. There have been many views on the best model of the source hypothesis. Often, and rightly, the models may be practically incompatible. Confusion between these views troubles and clouds discussion of the new alternatives offered. The multiplicity of studies on the pentateuchal text makes it easy to lose sight of the aim of these approaches, which is to bring a simplicity of understanding to a complex process of growth.2

1. M. Noth, A History of Pentateuchal Traditions, trans. B. W. Anderson (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972; reprint, Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1981; Cerman original, 1948).

2. Any attempt to poke fun at the complexity of analyses of biblical text must ultimately reckon with the reality that, in all approaches, comparable depth will generate comparable complexity.

-ix-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Sources of the Pentateuch: Texts, Introductions, Annotations
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Contents vii
  • Preface ix
  • Abbreviations xix
  • Chapter 1 - Introduction: Pentateuchal Source Criticism 1
  • Chapter 2 - The Priestly Document 21
  • Chapter 3 - The Yahwist Narrative 91
  • Chapter 4 - The Elohist Texts 161
  • Chapter 5 - Nonsource Texts: Material Other Than P, J, and E 195
  • Chapter 6 - Studies in Composite Texts 203
  • Bibliography 255
  • Index of Biblical Passages by Source 259
  • Index of Modern Authors 265
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 266

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.