Conclusion:The case studies in this volume,1 as well as the cross-national chapters,
underscore the rich differences among liberal democracies in their understandings of public health, their conceptions of freedom of expression, and
their tolerance of risk-taking behaviors that may also impose harms on
others. Despite the universal recognition of the toxicity of cigarette smoking, and a shared tool box of possible policy interventions, these case studies
reveal the emergence by the end of the twentieth century of a complex array
of tobacco-control strategies in eight industrialized democracies.As we considered the underlying political, legal, economic, and sociocultural features of the nations brought together in this project, and sought to
identify and understand both similarities and differences in their tobaccocontrol regimes, we identified four particularly important themes. They did
not so much inform the national case studies as emerge from them. Hence
they serve both as conclusions to this comparative study and as a starting
point that could orient others who may press the comparison in new and
revealing directions.The four themes are:
Lessons from the Comparative
Study of Tobacco Control
|• ||Science and evidence have played a critical but not determinative role in
influencing anti-tobacco advocacy and policy. In the face of uncertainties and ambiguities, ideological and political factors have been central.|
|• ||The identification of vulnerable third parties held to be in need of
protection has been a crucial justification for anti-tobacco policy and
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Unfiltered: Conflicts over Tobacco Policy and Public Health.
Contributors: Eric A. Feldman - Editor, Ronald Bayer - Editor.
Publisher: Harvard University Press.
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA.
Publication year: 2004.
Page number: 292.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.