The Military and the
Aftermath of the Coup
The tatmadaw occupies the pinnacle of power in the state.1 It has forged an identity for itself based on its perceptions of its past, present, and future roles in the country; has created myths of its efficacy and place in the society; and has attempted to convince the populace that its vision is the correct, indeed the only, one. It is virtually obsessed with unity—of the state, of the military, of the concepts of governance, of ideas and the need for orthodoxy, and of the administration. As Foreign Minister Win Aung said, “Our program of democracy is secondary. Our fundamental program is national unity. Given the fact that we have so many diverse races living together, if we are not united, there will be no chance of survival. A new government can emerge, but unless we have solved our problems of national unity, it will not last long.”2
The military is the most cohesive organization within the country; it occupies that position not only because of its taut command system, but also because since attaining power in 1962, it has consciously prevented the rise of any organization that it could not control or which was deemed a potential rival for any degree of autonomous power. Thus in the BSPP period, the party was founded by the military and dominated by both active duty and retired military, and all mass orga
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Burma, the State of Myanmar. Contributors: David I. Steinberg - Author. Publisher: Georgetown University Press. Place of publication: Washington, DC. Publication year: 2001. Page number: 69.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.