Playing It Safe: How the Supreme Court Sidesteps Hard Cases and Stunts the Development of Law

By Lisa A. Kloppenberg | Go to book overview
Save to active project

4
Avoiding Selected Affirmative
Action Challenges

The constitutional validity of affirmative action programs was one of the most contentious and important social and political issues of the late twentieth century. In the 1960s and 1970s, Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon instituted affirmative action programs at the federal level to further desegregation and promote equality, first for racial and religious minorities and later for women. Other programs ensued, with public and private entities attempting to equalize hiring and admission opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups by taking race and gender into account as positive factors. Today, affirmative action includes a large range of measures, from making job postings or other informa- tion widely accessible to tutorial services to scholarship assistance to granting a preference in admissions or hiring for a minority or female. From the 1970s through 1990s, litigants filed constitutional challenges to affirmative action programs, styled as “reverse discrimination” claims under the Equal Protection Clause. These challenges were grounded in the idea that it is more equitable for the government to make decisions based on individual merit rather than categorically by race or gender about scarce resources like government jobs and contracts or admission to public institutions. Defenders of affirmative action argue that such programs are needed to redress current and past discrimination and thereby ensure fairness and promote diversity.

This disagreement over the constitutionality of affirmative action is central to the legal debate about whether the Constitution should be “color-blind” or “color conscious.”1 Supporters of a color-blind reading say that race-based affirmative action is racist and divisive, stigmatizing minorities and entrenching invidious stereotypes, thereby perpetuating racism. Defenders argue that affirmative action is distinct from racism because it benefits, rather than harms, racial minorities. They assert that

-93-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Playing It Safe: How the Supreme Court Sidesteps Hard Cases and Stunts the Development of Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 308

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?