Confessions of Guilt: From Torture to Miranda and Beyond

By George C. Thomas III; Richard A. Leo | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Miranda Changes the Confessions World

At ten A.M. on June 13, 1966, Washington, D.C. was experiencing cool weather: It was only 68 degrees.1 But inside the Supreme Court building, emotions ran hot as Chief Justice Warren read his entire sixty-one-page opinion for the fivejustice majority in Miranda v. Arizona. “At times the emotion in his voice equaled that of the dissenters and bespoke the deep division in the Court over the new doctrine.”2 The dissenters read their opinions, too. “Justice Harlan, his face flushed and his voice occasionally faltering with emotion, denounced the decision as ‘dangerous experimentation’ at a time of a ‘high crime rate that is a matter of growing concern.’”

Our goal in this chapter is to describe the evolution of the Miranda doctrine from its beginning on that cool June day in 1966. One way to conceptualize this evolution is to focus on Miranda srhetorical embrace of the Hawkins-Leach dictum. Indeed, Miranda is mostly rhetoric—its narrow holding is that the defendants in the four cases before the Court had been compelled to answer questions by the inherent coercion of police interrogation. But, as we will see, different fact patterns would arise, and it was easy for less sympathetic Courts to modify Miranda’s analytical structure pretty much as they pleased. The journey here, which should be familiar by now, begins with Miranda’s view that suspects will be “deluded instruments of their own conviction” unless they receive warnings from the authorities and make a robust choice to waive those rights. Over the decades, however, the Court gradually modified the Hawkins-Leach view of suspects by assuming that the warnings solved any problem of inherent compulsion. Waiver is now almost automatic.

Upon reflection, one should not be surprised that the Court narrowed Miranda’s doctrine from what its expansive dicta suggested to what it is today. As Donald Dripps explained, the Court needed a “wide” rule that would apply to almost all interrogations because its previous attempts to offer guidance on a case-by-case basis had largely failed.3 A wide rule requires a fully theorized opinion with a deep justification. But deep justifications tend to be “intensely controversial. Rarely will a deep justification persuade a majority, and over time deep justifications that do


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Confessions of Guilt: From Torture to Miranda and Beyond


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 317

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?