Sexual Injustice: Supreme Court Decisions from Griswold to Roe

By Marc Stein | Go to book overview

3 :
Liberalization’s Lawyers

The Supreme Court can be criticized or celebrated for its doctrine of heteronormative supremacy, but to understand how the justices came to validate the doctrine it is important to recognize that they did not invent it on their own. Some scholars adopt biographical or macrohistorical methods to interpret the Court’s decisions. This chapter and the next two are microhistorical. They concentrate on the most direct and immediate influences on the Court: the strategies and arguments used by the activists and advocates who worked on these cases.

Did the litigants and lawyers who were victorious in Griswold, Fanny Hill, Loving, Eisenstadt, and Roe encourage the justices to privilege heteronormative sexual expression or did they endorse a more egalitarian doctrine? The second possibility is tempting for those who support the outcomes of these cases and those who admire these reformers. This chapter resists that temptation, arguing instead that liberals and leftists helped the Court develop its doctrine of sexual inequality. Over and over again, they told the justices that rulings in their favor would not necessarily disturb heteronormative laws.

In reaching this conclusion, this chapter does not criticize the political wisdom or legal effectiveness of these reformers. They were working within a legal system that encourages cautious and conservative argumentation. It is difficult to convince the Court to overturn laws and practices, and these advocates succeeded in part because they assured the justices that their arguments were respectful of the Constitution, consistent with legal precedents, and compatible with the tenets of heteronormative supremacy. Tactically, it may have made sense to condemn nonmarital sex and reproduction. Strategically, it may have been smart to select cases and develop arguments that deferred to the prevailing politics of respectability. This chapter criticizes these advocates for using arguments that undermined sexual freedom and equality, but it does so with a realistic, perhaps cynical, acknowledgment that doing otherwise would have reduced their chances of winning important victories.

-97-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Sexual Injustice: Supreme Court Decisions from Griswold to Roe
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Introduction 1
  • Part 1 - Decisions and Doctrines 25
  • 1 - Liberalization’s Limits from Griswold to Roe 27
  • 2 - Consistent Conservatism in Boutilier 57
  • Part 2 - Activists and Advocates 95
  • 3 - Liberalization’s Lawyers 97
  • 4 - Boutilier’s Defenders 133
  • 5 - Boutilier’s Defense 171
  • Part 3 - Readings and Readers 205
  • 6 - Remembering Griswold to Roe 207
  • 7 - Forgetting Boutilier 243
  • Epilogue 279
  • Notes 303
  • Acknowledgments 345
  • Index 349
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 364

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.