Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics

By Leif Lewin; Donald Lavery | Go to book overview

When we come finally to the institutional factors in the producer perspective, we arrive at the public-choice school. The citizens get the public sector that the politicians (Downs) or the bureaucrats (Niskanen) conceive of and put on the market.49

Discarding or de-emphasizing the budget-maximization hypothesis does not leave one by any means empty-handed when one tries to account for the increase of the public sector in the United States and Western Europe.


CONCLUSIONS

To follow the debate concerning bureaucrats as budget-maximizers is to listen to a lively and intelligent, at times even brilliant, conversation in which insights and hypotheses cross swords while the will to test the notion systematically is less well developed. In this theoretically top- heavy debate, with each new model more elegant than the last, the hypothesis lives on as if it stated something about reality, as if it were confirmed through observation and not merely the expression of an obstinate postulate. The aura of legend has arisen around the budget- maximization hypothesis and we become mesmerized into believing in its vitality by being confronted with it everywhere. On the popular television programme 'Yes Minister', Sir Humphrey Appleby says, 'The Civil Service does not make profits or losses. Ergo, we measure success by the size of our staff and budget. By definition, a big department is more successful than a small one . . . this simple proposition is the basis of our whole system.'50

No matter how such quips may tickle our prejudices and strengthen our impressionistic experiences, a scientific description must be founded on more systematic work. In this respect one is in the first place struck by the manifoldness and complexity inherent in the causal explanations offered. To trace the growth of the public sector to a single cause such as the bureaucracy's selfish interest in maximum budgets is, as the survey of the debate has shown, clearly to over- simplify matters. A number of conditions of the most various nature seem to be at work. At the same time, the relations between these conditions are themselves complicated. Simply to run Tarschys's coarse classification through a regression analysis in the hope of determining the explanatory power of the separate factors would not be worth the effort, since the factors are themselves so different from

-94-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page vii
  • Contents ix
  • I- Self-Interest and Public Interest 1
  • 2- Does the Voter Follow His Pocket-Book? 29
  • CONCLUSIONS 58
  • 3- Are Politicians Vote-Maximizers? 60
  • CONCLUSIONS 73
  • 4- Are Bureaucrats Budget-Maximizers? 75
  • CONCLUSIONS 94
  • 5- Individual and Collective Rationality 98
  • Notes 113
  • Bibliography 129
  • Index 141
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 154

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.