The Contribution of the Courts Nuremberg, Tokyo, and the Rest

All of the trials conducted by the victorious UN powers after the Second World War are popularly known as 'war-crimes trials' and, strictly speaking, most of them were so. The persons in the dock were usually there because they were accused expressly of offences against the laws and customs of war as codified in the 1899 and 1907 Hague Regulations and the 1929 Geneva Conventions. The judgments given in some of those courts were, as shall soon appear, of importance in relation to the clarification and development of the law of war, and (with the possible exception of the Nuremberg Principles) to that alone. The Nuremberg Principles are so called because they originated in a Resolution of the General Assembly (Resolution 95, adopted on 11 November 1946) headed: Affirmation of the Principles of International Law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal. They were in some fashion reaffirmed by the UN's International Law Commission (established by GA Resolution 174 on 21 November 1947) in mid-1950. 1 Jurists tend to be evasive and non-committal about the extent of their significance, but at least it can be said that the GA's unanimous vote 'indicated subscription by a large number of States to the substantive law of war crimes, including the principle of individual criminal responsibility, and to the lawful exercise of criminal jurisdiction over such individuals'.2 Only at the two most conspicuous of these post-war trials (which are to be numbered in hundreds), the International Military Tribunals known to history as the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, were defendants tried also for other alleged offences. It is important to bear in mind what was the relationship of those other offences with the law of war, and what it was not.

Crimes against humanity, which figured equally with crimes against peace and war crimes in the Nuremberg Indictment, were thus carefully defined: 'murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts

They are reproduced in Schindler and Toman, 883 and 835-6 respectively. Roberts and Guelff, always cautious, leave them out.
Draper in US Naval War College International War Studies 62 ( 1980), 247-62. at 259-60. He might have added the law on crimes against humanity, which Principle VI equally lists. Layfolk who have taken at face value the phrases about the supremacy of international over national law, and have accordingly perceived opportunity to initiate actions against members or officials of their own governments, have to the best of my knowledge been consistently disappointed.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
War and Law since 1945


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 434

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?