Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism

By Steven Kull; I. M. Destler | Go to book overview
Save to active project

4
UN Peacekeeping

The gap between practitioners and the public on the subject of United Nations peacekeeping follows the same basic pattern outlined in the two prior chapters. The dominant view among the practitioners we interviewed was that most Americans have a negative view of UN peacekeeping in general, oppose contributing U.S. troops to UN peacekeeping operations, and are intensely opposed to the idea of putting U.S. troops under a foreign UN commander. In the event of U.S. troop fatalities in the course of a UN peacekeeping operation, most practitioners thought that a majority of Americans would want to immediately withdraw and that this was the majority reaction to the fatalities in Somalia in October 1993.

Polls, however, show that the majority of Americans supports the idea of UN peacekeeping, though support has softened with the perceived passivity of UN peacekeeping operations. Support for contributing U.S. troops is fairly high in principle, though a variety of factors can diminish support, especially the perception that an operation will not succeed. Opposition to putting U.S. troops under a foreign UN commander is much milder than practitioners assume, and the idea that most Americans would respond, and in Somalia did respond, to American troop fatalities by wanting to withdraw immediately appears to be a myth.

-81-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 312

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?