Community and Political Thought Today

By Peter Augustine Lawler; Dale McConkey | Go to book overview
Save to active project

The Illiberal Leo Strauss


The liberalism of Leo Strauss has always been questionable. While Strauss and his students have been strong supporters of the American regime against its rivals,

Strauss's thought appears foreign and forbidding, and his defense of the Constitution strikes much of academic liberalism as decidedly "antiliberal."1 Most disturbing to liberals, Strauss issues a rousing call to arms against modern egalitarian ideals. That Strauss left behind a faithful school of followers ready to defend classical aristocracy only adds to his perceived threat. Strauss announces his elitism in an apocalyptic rhetoric, one that focuses on the "crisis of the West" and highlights his divergences from modern liberalism. Resurrecting the classical Greeks, Strauss describes a hierarchical "natural" order in which "philosophers" and "gentlemen" rule over the "vulgar" democratic masses. Inequality is not only natural, it is radical: the differences between human types are not ones of degree but ones of kind. For Strauss, some human beings are simply more noble than others. The great gap between these human types produces essential conflicts, requiring that philosophers conceal their true beliefs. Of course, Strauss also musters a defense of liberal democracy, albeit on grounds far removed from the ideals of liberty and equality. While this alternative legitimation should raise questions, it more typically draws battle lines. Strauss's critics object to the implicit immorality of Strauss's disseminating "philosophers" and the arrogance of those Straussians who see themselves as belonging to that exclusive club.2 Strauss's rediscovery of "esoteric teaching" renders suspect his own political rhetoric. Naturally, Strauss's defenders protest that he is innocent and misunderstood.3

Generally missing from this debate is a systematic analysis of Strauss's anti


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Community and Political Thought Today


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 244

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?