Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Unseen Wall Street of 1969-1975: And Its Significance for Today

By: Alec Benn | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 138
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

15
An Unintended Consequence of the Imposition of Competitive Commission Rates: A Boom in Soft Dollars1

Stanley Sporkin and other members of the securities and Exchange Commission staff got an unpleasant surprise in the months following the elimination of the fixed commission system on May 1, 1975. Here's why:

Stanley and his associates had long deplored -- since the sixties -- certain ways many brokerage firms attracted commission business from mutual funds. Stanley felt it was acceptable for a brokerage firm, like Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, to get orders from a mutual fund by supplying the fund's advisors with information and opinions about stocks. However, Stanley did not, for example, approve of what Glore Forgan did for the advisors to Investors Overseas Service, a mutual fund that invested in other mutual funds.

In 1966, Glore Forgan Staats Inc. received more than a million dollars a month in commissions from Investors Overseas Service (a fact that was, naturally, hidden from reporters). Glore Forgan kept only about half that money. At the end of each month, Glore Forgan received a directive from IOS listing firms and people with whom they should share the commissions they received. Without question, Glore Forgan would write and send the checks.

Some checks went to firms and people who had supplied IOS with information that helped IOS invest more productively. But most of the checks went to brokers and brokerage firms that had sold IOS funds to investors. This was done so as to legally circumvent the Investment Company Act of 1940 which limited the amount of money mutual funds could pay brokerage firms and brokers who sold their funds.

Many other brokerage firms and mutual fund advisors engaged in this

-138-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 216
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?