Liberty, Property, and Privacy: Toward a Jurisprudence of Substantive Due Process

By Edward Keynes | Go to book overview
Save to active project

8
Reproductive Liberty and Individual Autonomy -- Contraception and Abortion

Since 1965 the Supreme Court has employed the Fourteenth Amendment to create a new fundamental right to reproductive liberty. Similar to liberty of contract, reproductive liberty is an unenumerated right that the Warren and Burger Courts have read into the due process clause. As the framing of the amendment suggests, however, there is no greater justification for inferring reproductive liberty than liberty of contract from the due process clause. Nor is there any persuasive rationale, derived from the Constitution's language or history, for giving privacy rights greater protection than unenumerated economic liberty and property rights. In fact, the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 regarded economic liberty and property rights as indispensable to personal freedom.

Nevertheless, after 1937 the Supreme Court denigrated economic liberty and property rights, while granting heightened judicial protection to reproductive freedom. Refusing to invalidate state limitations on economic liberty, between 1965 and 1990 the Court struck various prohibitions and regulations of contraception and abortion as burdensome interferences with personal liberty. In 1983, Sandra Day O'Connor began criticizing the majority's approach as unnecessarily intrusive on the states' police power.1 Jus

____________________
1
O'Connor (dissenting) in Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 ( 1983); (dissenting) in Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 ( 1986); and (concurring in part) in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S. Ct. 3040 ( 1989).

-181-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Liberty, Property, and Privacy: Toward a Jurisprudence of Substantive Due Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 240

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?