TWO Theories of Human Rights The preceding chapter reviewed major developments in the international politics of human rights over the past fifty years. This chapter examines three sets of theoretical issues: | 1. | philosophical theories of human rights, | | 2. | the place of human rights in international society, and | | 3. | political realism and cultural relativism, which challenge the very idea of international human rights policies. | THE NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS The term human rights indicates both their nature and their source: they are the rights that one has simply because one is human. They are held by all human beings, irrespective of any rights or duties individuals may (or may not) have as citizens, members of families, workers, or parts of any public or private organization or association. They are universal rights. If all human beings have them simply because they are human, human rights are held equally by all. 1 And because being human cannot be re- nounced, lost, or forfeited, human rights are inalienable. Even the cruelest torturer and the most debased victim are still human beings. In practice, not all people enjoy all their human rights, let alone enjoy them equally. Nonetheless, all human beings have the same human rights and hold them equally and inalienably. What exactly does it mean to have a right? In English, "right" has two principal moral and political senses. "Right" may refer to what is right, the right thing to do. For example, we say that it is right to help the needy and wrong (the opposite of right) -18- |