...And Economic Justice for All: Welfare Reform for the 21st Century

By Michael L. Murray | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Notes
1.
Charles Murray, Losing Ground.
2.
Where the other Murray and I disagree is on what should be done after it is eliminated. He would have those in poverty rely on private aid and place the children in orphanages. I argue for the guaranteed adequate income.
3.
If the GAI benefit is less than what employers wish to provide as unemployment benefits they could supplement it. This supplementation would be through a private program, however.
4.
Unless it turns out that it provides the best quality housing for the money, in which case recipients will choose to live there. This is a major difference.
5.
I say "purported" benefits because I am not convinced competiton can work in the area of education. As in the case of health care, the consumer is not in a very good position to select the best quality service at the lowest price. Unless the consumer can do so, the major source of regulation of the market is lost. Nonetheless, in both cases I am open to the possibility a mechanism can be developed for aiding consumers in this decision.
6.
According to Lester Thurow, "Why Are We so Reluctant to Redistribute Wealth?", New York Times, printed in Des Moines Register, April 18, 1976, pp. B1-2, "Most of those we normally think of as rich are rich in wealth rather than income." He notes that redistribution of wealth could be accomplished by higher inheritance taxes, higher taxes on capital gains, or perhaps a wealth tax such as that used in Sweden. I recognize the merits of his argument, but am not proposing an overall tax on wealth. In my plan, wealth is only considered to the extent it affects eligibility for the GAI payment.
7.
Granted, they have utilities, insurance, and taxes, but this is generally less costly than rent.
8.
Of course, to the extent these investments are generating an income, that income will be included in the GAI calculation. On the other hand, some investments do not produce current income, but do increase in value (nondividend-paying stocks or idle land, for example).
9.
Unlike our present welfare system which denies eligibility to those with assets above a certain level, wealth causes no loss of eligibility for GAI.
10.
Conceivably, the use of the per capita figure could have an impact on population growth. Might individuals change their procreation decisions knowing an additional child will reduce the overall level of the grant?

-201-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
...And Economic Justice for All: Welfare Reform for the 21st Century
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 234

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?