place without the approval of a Republican National Convention. This
process itself spells delay. For example, recommendations of the GOP Delegates and Organizations Committee, established in 1969 to encourage
greater rank-and-file participation in the delegate selection process, could
not be considered until the 1972 Republican Convention. Furthermore, if
any action had been taken by the 1972 GOP convention on the rules, they
could not be implemented until the 1976 convention. No wonder one critic
complained, "The system employed by the Republicans institutionalizes
conflict avoidance; it deflects and rechannels dissent before it can emerge
ultimately at the national convention."14
Based on a review of the two parties' management of the presidential
selection process over the past quarter century, students of presidential
nominating reform would do well to focus their sights chiefly on the Democratic Party, for the Republican Party prefers to continue doing business
the old-fashioned way--that is, to defer to the state parties in all phases of
the delegate selection process.
The authoritative work on the early period of the presidential primary is Louise Overacker, The Presidential Primary ( New York: Macmillan, 1926).
Theodore H. White, The Making of the President ( New York: Atheneum, 1969), pp. 257-313.
See Mandate for Reform: A Report of the Commission on Party Structure
and Delegate Selection to the Democratic National Committee ( McGovern-Fraser
Commission) ( Washington, D.C.: Democratic National Committee, 1970), pp. 9- 32.
Byron E. Shafer, Quiet Revolution: The Struggle for the Democratic Party
and the Shaping of Post-Reform Politics ( New York: Sage Foundation, 1983).
Democratic Party of the United States et al. v. LaFollette et al., 101 S.Ct. 1010 ( 1981).
Martin P. Wattenberg, The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
Nelson W. Polsby, Consequences of Party Reform ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 74-75.
Elaine C. Kamarck, "Delegate Allocation Rules in Presidential Nomination
Systems: A Comparison between the Democrats and the Republicans," The Journal
of Law and Politics 4 (Fall 1987): 276.
William Crotty, Party Reform ( New York: Longman, 1983), p. 215.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: U.S. Presidential Primaries and the Caucus-Convention System:A Sourcebook.
Contributors: James W. Davis - Author.
Publisher: Greenwood Press.
Place of publication: Westport, CT.
Publication year: 1997.
Page number: 66.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.