U.S. Presidential Primaries and the Caucus-Convention System: A Sourcebook

By James W. Davis | Go to book overview
Save to active project

visive"--proved to be a serious miscalculation by his strategists. This tactical mistake quickly became obvious when Reagan lost to George Bush in Iowa. Consequently, Reagan quickly reversed himself and announced that he would debate his rivals in the New Hampshire primary.

Fifth, recent shifts in TV and radio talk show programming may have relegated presidential primary debates to a lesser role in future nominating campaigns. Larry King Live, Donahue, Good Morning America, and similar types of talk shows and entertainment programs offer more exciting one-on-one opportunities for presidential candidates to reach huge audiences without most of the risk of facing unanticipated debate questions. Also, the candidate on a talk show is less likely to alienate rival contenders than during the primary debates. H. Ross Perot, the Texas billionaire, demonstrated in 1992 how easy it was to use the TV talk show format to circumvent the regular political process of debates, nominating conventions, and traditional campaigning to become a serious contender for the presidency.

And sixth, presidential primary debates also help leading contenders hone and polish their debating skills for the general election campaign--if they win the nomination. Candidates who have undergone the fire of primary debates are more likely to make formidable opponents in the fall presidential election. Indeed, in the 1992 general election campaign, President Bush's managers publicly conceded that he would be at a considerable disadvantage in debating Democrat Bill Clinton whose forensic skills were highly rated.


FINAL REMARKS

Presidential primary debates can sometimes be a decisive turning point in the nominating race. Indeed, Ronald Reagan's "I paid for this microphone" histrionics in the famous 1980 New Hampshire debate helped carry him to victory in the Granite State and subsequently to the nomination and the White House.


NOTES
1.
James W. Davis, Presidential Primaries: Road to the White House ( New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1967), pp. 58-59.
2.
Charles A. H. Thomson and Frances M. Shattuck, The 1956 Presidential Campaign ( Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1960), pp. 54-56.
3.
Theodore H. White, The Making of the President, 1960 ( New York: Atheneum, 1961), p. 109. Because both Kennedy and Humphrey focused heavily on the merits of Democratic party proposals, the GOP national chairman demanded "equal time," arguing that the so-called "debate" merely helped the Democrats advertise their positions. In his opinion, the joint appearance had "all the sharpness

-155-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
U.S. Presidential Primaries and the Caucus-Convention System: A Sourcebook
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 298

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?