Bush Fights War on the Fiscal Front: Despite the Uncertainty of Economic Survival, the Senate Trims the President's Stimulus Package, Even While Eyeing the Defense Supplemental Appropriations Bill as a Cash Cow. (the Nation: Federal Budget)

By Cherry, Sheila R. | Insight on the News, April 15, 2003 | Go to article overview

Bush Fights War on the Fiscal Front: Despite the Uncertainty of Economic Survival, the Senate Trims the President's Stimulus Package, Even While Eyeing the Defense Supplemental Appropriations Bill as a Cash Cow. (the Nation: Federal Budget)


Cherry, Sheila R., Insight on the News


March proved to be as uncertain a month for federal budgeteers as it was for weather forecasters and basketball fans. House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle (R-Iowa) successfully moved federal-budget resolution H. Con. Res. 95 through the House just before 3:00 a.m. on March 21 by a close vote of 215-212. The budgetary framework kept President George W. Bush's spending levels mostly as requested for fiscal 2004. But the companion bill didn't fare as well in the Senate. Republican Sens. Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, George Voinovich of Ohio and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island joined their unanimously partisan Democratic colleagues to pare the administration's $726 billion tax cut down to $350 billion by a vote of 51-48. Days earlier, a similar attempt in the Senate to slash the tax-cut proposal had failed.

The surprise vote to cut the budget resolution came late in the afternoon after Bush had begun the day presenting Congress with a $74.7 billion request for a wartime supplemental appropriation. The president said the funding request for military operations in Iraq and homeland security represented less than 1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). White House spokesman Ari Fleischer reminded critics who charged the administration with waiting for clearance of its tax-cut proposal before offering the secondary request that Congress was well aware the supplemental was coming.

Democrats, though determined to prove Congress could pass a budget resolution quickly, were equally determined to attack the tax-cut component of the president's budget. They insisted that two major items were missing from the proposed budget: reorganization funding for the Department of Homeland Security and the costs of the war in Iraq. Added to a fiscal 2003 baseline deficit of more than $246 billion, the administration's critics charged, the costs of international initiatives would cause too much "shock and awe" to an already shaky U.S. economy.

The president's request, if passed, would be supplemental to the fiscal 2003 omnibus appropriations (spending) bill that was approved in February, rather than scored against the currently pending budget-framework resolution for the fiscal period of Oct. 1, 2003, through Sept. 30, 2004. The two budget-framework resolutions now are headed to a joint House and Senate conference, where they can be addressed anonymously. Budget resolutions are not signed into law, but they are binding on the House and Senate to govern the spending agenda for the year's appropriation schedule.

Noting the budget deficit for 2003, Brian Riedl, a federal-budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation, estimates that, "This may bring it closer to $380 billion for the year. It [eventually] could reach $400 billion for FY 2003," he adds. For fiscal 2004, Riedl predicted a $300 billion deficit as well.

The president is said to be requesting $9.4 trillion for fiscal 2004, but one government source advised that by comparison the deficit is only one small factor. As this official explained, it is more important to look at that amount as a percentage of the economy. "Back in the 1980s, when we had deficits as far as the eye could see, we had a much smaller economy," the source noted. "Our economy now is four times bigger, so a $200 billion [deficit now] is the equivalent of what $800 billion would have been then--in terms of its impact on the economy. It's just important to keep that in perspective."

Anything that Congress spends this year eventually would be built into the permanent, overall economic baseline. But since funding for military action in Iraq and components of homeland security are being considered as a separate part of a supplemental bill, it only would add to the deficit for fiscal 2003, the government source explains. "It doesn't do anything to next year"

As the president posited, said an official, $74.7 billion is not a very large percentage of a $4 trillion economy.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bush Fights War on the Fiscal Front: Despite the Uncertainty of Economic Survival, the Senate Trims the President's Stimulus Package, Even While Eyeing the Defense Supplemental Appropriations Bill as a Cash Cow. (the Nation: Federal Budget)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.