How Reliable Are Radiocarbon Laboratories? A Report on the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-Comparison (FIRI) (1998-2001). (Method)

By Boaretto, Elisabetta; Bryant, Charlotte et al. | Antiquity, March 2003 | Go to article overview

How Reliable Are Radiocarbon Laboratories? A Report on the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-Comparison (FIRI) (1998-2001). (Method)


Boaretto, Elisabetta, Bryant, Charlotte, Carmi, Israel, Cook, Gordon, Gulliksen, Steinar, Harkness, Doug, Heinemeier, Jan, McClure, John, McGee, Edward, Naysmith, Philip, Possnert, Goran, Scott, Marian, van der Plicht, Hans, van Strydonck, Mark, Antiquity


Rationale

The most recent radiocarbon inter-comparison exercise (FIRI), completed in 2001, was also the most extensive so far, with 85 laboratories participating. The study was designed firstly to assess the comparability of the results from different laboratories and then to quantify the extent and possible causes of any inter-laboratory variation. Radiocarbon dating is universally employed as a dating tool in archaeology, but there is an inevitable diversity of experimental approaches within radiocarbon dating facilities and in this situation the issue of comparability of results amongst laboratories becomes paramount. In keeping with the principles of analytical science, radiocarbon laboratories have always been conscious of the importance of accuracy and precision for their reported results i.e. the ethos of analytical quality control (QC) which in turn is the foundation for the wider concept of quality assurance (QA). The care and effort given to establishing and maintaining primary standards and reference materials exemplify this concern for good quality management within the radiocarbon community.

As early as 1989, Long and Kalin (1990) stressed that it was incumbent on individual radiocarbon laboratories to engage in a formal programme of quality assurance (QA) while Polach (1989) noted that the opportunity for internal checking by individual laboratories in routine [sup.14]C measurement was hampered by a lack of suitable quality control (QC) and reference materials. The work reported here describes ongoing international efforts by means of a laboratory inter-comparison to assure users of laboratory quality and comparability of measurements and to provide suitable quality control and reference materials. This work builds on the previous laboratory inter-comparisons that have taken place over the last 20 years (ISG, 1982; Scott et al, 1991; Rozanski et al, 1992; Gulliksen & Scott, 1995).

A substantial effort has been made by the [sup.14]C community to develop and apply both internal and external QA procedures. FIRI provides a part of these procedures in the form of an independent check of laboratory performance. However, it only provides a spot check of operational performance at the time it was carried out and does not measure consistent performance over a period of time and so should not form the basis of a `league table of laboratory performance'. This is why the FIRI results are published without laboratory attribution.

Objectives

The specific objectives of the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-comparison (FIRI) (Bryant et al, 2000) were to provide:

* An unambiguous demonstration of the degree of consistency or otherwise among the results obtained, on a routine basis, from different laboratories. This information is crucial for both laboratories and procurers (researchers and funding agencies).

* Quantification of the extent of, and identification of, the possible causes of, any interlaboratory variation.

* Direct assessment of the comparability of liquid scintillation counting (LSC), gas proportional counting (GPC) and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) techniques.

* Creation of suitable, well-characterized quality control and reference materials.

* Assurance of trace-ability of the measurements and provision of an independent check on laboratory performance.

These objectives are directly related to analytical quality control by focusing on experimental accuracy, precision and reproducibility as indices for the assessment and inter-comparison of laboratory performance. Evidence of an acceptable level of analytical quality control is the essential precursor for overall quality assurance. The basic methodology employed in the inter-comparison was to invite laboratories to date a series of reference samples so as to compare their performances and the performance of different radiocarbon methods.

Selection, preparation and testing of control samples

The selection and preparation of large samples of homogeneous [sup. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Reliable Are Radiocarbon Laboratories? A Report on the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-Comparison (FIRI) (1998-2001). (Method)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.