Child Sexual Abuse: Prevention or Promotion?

By Bolen, Rebecca M. | Social Work, April 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Child Sexual Abuse: Prevention or Promotion?


Bolen, Rebecca M., Social Work


School-based programs are the primary means of addressing the prevention of child sexual abuse in the United States. These programs were originally developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s during a time of increased awareness of the problem of child sexual abuse. Originally, this awareness was largely the result of writings by feminists such as Florence Rush (1980) and Judith Herman (1981), who suggested that dynamics in society as a whole were a primary cause of the prevalence of abuse. Feminists believed that child sexual abuse was symptomatic of a patriarchal society in which men had power over girls and women. Abuse was conceptualized as an extension of socially normative behavior between men and women. One effect of this literature was to bring the problem of child sexual abuse to public awareness.

Russell's (1983) prevalence study, the first random community prevalence survey ever done, contributed to a sense of urgency concerning child sexual abuse when she reported that 38 percent of all female respondents in her sample had experienced contact sexual abuse as a child. In the 1980s, professional literature on the problem of child sexual abuse also began to expand rapidly. At the same time, high-profile cases started to be sensationalized in the media, especially abuse in day care centers, contributing further support for a sense of urgency.

Pressured to respond within this highly charged public and political arena, schools and other community organizations moved to develop programs directed at teaching skills to children so that they could avoid abuse (Finkelhor, 1990). At the same time, dynamics of offenders were poorly understood. The prevailing model for understanding offenders divided them into fixated and regressed (Groth, Hobson, & Gary, 1982). Fixated offenders, with their pedophilic tendencies toward abusing multiple children, both strangers and acquaintances, were considered to be the more dangerous offenders. In reaction, stranger danger programs were implemented.

At the same time, the developing knowledge base was recognizing that children were at even greater risk of being abused by individuals they already knew--even relatives. Answering this concern, programs expanded to include other types of potential offenders, although programs almost exclusively remained targeted at elementary school-age children. Thus, these early, but palliative, programs targeted only the reduction of victimization instead of reduction of the offending behavior itself. Although there were some early calls for prevention programs directed at potential offenders (Swift, 1979), these programs were never implemented and, over time, programs targeting potential victims became the central method by which prevention strategies were taught to children.

Today prevention programs are available, for some age level, in almost all school districts (Daro & Salmon-Cox, 1994). These programs have three objectives: (1) to teach children the concept of sexual abuse, often described as "bad touching" in private places; (2) to teach children that they can refuse such overtures and to get away from the person; and (3) to encourage children to tell an adult about overtures that occur (Finkelhor & Strapko, 1992). The central goal of these techniques is to prevent abuse by relatives, known others, and strangers by reducing the "vulnerability of children to abuse and exploitation" (Kohl, 1993, p. 139).

Child abuse prevention programs are, for the most part, successful at teaching children concepts about sexual abuse and skills in self-protection (Finkelhor & Strapko, 1992; Rispens, Aleman, & Goudena, 1997). Numerous evaluations of prevention programs also note an increase in the number of disclosures of abuse (Finkelhor & Strapko). Although these are important and encouraging findings, other studies have found that these benefits are not without cost. Finkelhor and Dziuba-Leatherman (1995) found that some children, because of the information presented in the programs, reported being more worried about the possibility of abuse and had a greater fear of adults.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Child Sexual Abuse: Prevention or Promotion?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?