Exports and Imports; for U.S. Manufacturers, It Is a Difficult Balancing Act
Byline: Donald Manzullo and Michael R. Czinkota, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
U.S. manufacturing needs policy help, now. Low exports and a surge of imports have left the sector vulnerable, endangering future economic progress and hollowing out our defense industrial base.
Our trade deficits for goods with Mexico, Germany, Japan and China are huge and getting bigger. Last year, the U.S. deficit with just China was $103 billion. We have an imbalance of $111 billion in motor vehicles alone. The imbalance is actually greater than even we can quantify, because there is no way to measure the amount of foreign parts in U.S.- exported goods.
U.S. firms clearly don't do enough exporting. It's not that they don't want to. There are simply too many bureaucratic obstacles for many of them to overcome. Compared to almost 34 percent for the European Union and 26 percent for China, U.S. exports pale ,with only 11 percent of total gross domestic product. Almost half of all import shipments come from foreign affiliates, captive suppliers and U.S. subsidiaries.
The peril is apparent: When the manufacturing sector disappears, the effects go beyond lost jobs. Replacement parts become unavailable. Product re-orders take weeks rather than days. Do we really want to depend on old friends abroad for the rapid supply of manufactures critical to national security?
Manufacturing migration affects innovation and market responsiveness. By staying close to market and using emerging technologies in new products, companies gain experience and boost performance. When production is moved offshore, the rapid-response capability to market demands is dulled. A good example is what is happening with the SARS virus and its impact on global supply chains. The April 22, 2003 issue of Investor's Business Daily states "the threat of supply chain disruptions from China, Taiwan, Singapore and Indonesia is real ... Computer, electronics, apparel and other firms are edgy about supply-chain troubles as their Asian partners send thousands of workers home and shut assembly lines."
When manufacturing firms close up shop, file for bankruptcy protection or move operations overseas, it's Americans who lose. We lose local expertise and strong competition. The once-demanding customers for American made products now become demanding customers for foreign-made goods.
Moving manufacturing overseas will also have other long-term consequences. A study at Temple University has found that the creation of new technology is a painstaking learning process of continual adjustment as new productive methods are tested. It is the small and medium manufacturers that create 55 percent of workplace innovations. The shifts …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Exports and Imports; for U.S. Manufacturers, It Is a Difficult Balancing Act. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: The Washington Times (Washington, DC). Publication date: May 27, 2003. Page number: A17. © 2009 The Washington Times LLC. COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.