Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology

By Dequech, David | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology


Dequech, David, Journal of Economic Issues


A minority of economists and a relatively larger contingent of scholars in other social sciences have attempted to show that the neoclassical theory of economic behavior has serious limitations and to develop alternative approaches. In this effort, both non-neoclassical economists and non-economists have enriched their work with research done outside their original disciplines, but there is room for much more interdisciplinary cooperation.

This paper is part of a broader interdisciplinary discussion of institutions, cognition, and economic behavior begun in Dequech 2003a. The present paper examines what has been called, in recent economic sociology, the cognitive and cultural embeddedness of economic behavior, relating this to discussions of institutions in economics. It considers not only the so-called new economic sociology but also part of the new institutionalism in sociology, an approach marked by its emphasis on cultural-cognitive issues, according tow. Richard Scott (2001, 57). Additionally, the paper is intended to facilitate communication among institutional economists and economic sociologists, which requires discussing some key concepts and how they might be translated into a different language and related to each other. Given this journal's readership, a more specific aim is to make institutional economists more aware of interesting lines of work in economic sociology.

The paper is organized as follows. The first section discusses the notion of embeddedness, which is a core concept for many contemporary economic sociologists. Different varieties of embeddedness are identified. The second section examines the notion of culture and the influence of culture on economic behavior and then relates this to the economists' treatment of institutions. The third section shows the strong intertwinement of cognitive and cultural embeddedness. Finally, the fourth section highlights one among other points concerning the relation between cognition, culture, and economic behavior: the different ways in which culture and cognition are constitutive of economic agents.

Kinds of Embeddedness of Economic Action

The notion of embeddedness may be traced back to Karl Polanyi and Clifford Geertz. It was revitalized by Mark Granovetter (1985) and has since then become a central concept in the new economic sociology. Granovetrer's influential article focuses on the embeddedness of economic action "in networks of interpersonal relations" (504). Granovetter (486) used the expression "structural embeddedness" to indicate that not only the personal relations (the "relational" aspect of embeddedness) matter but also the "the structure of the overall network of relations" (1990, 98-99).

In Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio's (1990) wider conception, four kinds of embeddedness of economic action are identified: cognitive, cultural, structural, and political embeddedness. Cognitive embedded ness refers to "the ways in which the structured regularities of mental processes limit the exercise of economic reasoning." This notion calls attention to "the limited ability of both human and corporate actors" (15-16) to employ the kind of rationality required by neoclassical economics. Cultural embeddedness refers to "the role of shared collective understandings in shaping economic strategies and goals" (17). Structural embeddedness is defined, following Granovetter, as "the contextualization of economic exchange in patterns of ongoing interpersonal relations" (18). Finally, by political embeddedness they mean "the manner in which economic institutions and decisions are shaped by a struggle for power that involves economic actors and nonmarket institutions," such as the legal framework of the state (20).

The largest part of the research in economic sociology since its revival has studied embeddedness by focusing on networks, so much so that this has become known to many people as the embeddedness perspective (see, for example, the surveys in Swedberg 1997, 162, 1.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?