Guess Whose Privacy Will Be Protected

By Glover, Stephen | Daily Mail (London), June 17, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Guess Whose Privacy Will Be Protected


Glover, Stephen, Daily Mail (London)


Byline: STEPHEN GLOVER

DOES THIS country need a privacy law? Yes, says the Labourdominated House of Commons Culture, Media and Sports Select Committee. It is by far the most controversial recommendation in an otherwise generally temperate report published yesterday.

Just why the committee should think such a law is necessary is a bit difficult to fathom bearing in mind its judgment that ' overall, standards of Press behaviour . . . have improved over the past decade'. It also accepts that the performance of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) - the self-regulatory body which oversees newspapers - has got better over the same period.

The justification the committee offers for advocating a new privacy law is the new Human Rights Act. Several people have claimed a right of privacy under Article 8 of this baleful piece of Europe-inspired legislation.

Nonetheless, in most cases, judges have shown a reluctance to develop a new privacy law themselves and have suggested that privacy and the Press is a matter for the PCC.

So the select committee's suggestion that a new law is necessary to clarify issues of privacy does not wash. By its own admission, the record of newspapers in respecting privacy has improved, though no one would pretend it is perfect. The judges seem generally happy for the PCC, rather than they themselves, to determine whether the privacy of individuals has been unjustifiably invaded by newspapers.

Could it be that the Labourdominated Culture, Media and Sports Select Committee has a hidden agenda? A privacy law would curb the ability of the Press to report the activities of the rich and powerful. In France and other countries with privacy legislation, it is the rich and powerful who threaten to invoke the law in the relatively unusual event of newspapers having the courage of their convictions.

THE FINANCIAL and sexual shenanigans of leading politicians - often they are connected - may go unreported. The late President of France, Francois Mitterrand, kept a mistress by whom he had a daughter, but this only came to light shortly before his death when a book was published. The same newspapers which ignored his sexual adventures were slow to condemn him for the sleazy and sometimes criminal friends with whom he surrounded himself.

If a privacy law were introduced in this country, only the rich and powerful - and they include politicians - could afford to resort to the courts. The PCC, for all its failings, is open to all-comers regardless of their status or wealth. Last year it dealt with over 3,300 cases on matters ranging far beyond privacy. In the first quarter of this year, almost 70 per cent of complainants expressed satisfaction at the PCC's service.

It is difficult to escape the conclusion that at least some of the MPs on the Culture, Media and Sports Select Committee resent the critical eye of the Press on their private affairs. Occasionally they may be justified. About six years ago, a Sunday red-top tabloid newspaper arranged secret cameras in a bedroom to film an errant married Tory MP as he engaged in sex with a young nightclub hostess. The public interest defence was not easy to see, though much else was.

But a brief survey of the past ten years shows how far many MPs of both main parties have fallen from the standards of financial and sexual probity which they proclaim and which the public has a right to expect in its elected representatives.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Guess Whose Privacy Will Be Protected
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?