Preserving Domesticity: Reading Tupperware in Women's Changing Domestic, Social and Economic Roles

By Vincent, Susan | The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, May 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Preserving Domesticity: Reading Tupperware in Women's Changing Domestic, Social and Economic Roles


Vincent, Susan, The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology


TUPPERWARE HAS A WAY OF BRINGING WOMEN TOGETHER, not always for the expected reason. When a friend invited me to her Tupperware party some years ago, I felt uncomfortable and decided to investigate the reasons for my distaste. In search of a minor diversion from my main research project, I decided to explore Tupperware's image of gendered domesticity. I did not take into account Tupperware's powerful snowballing effect. As other women learned that I was thinking about Tupperware, they approached me and I became a willing listener of their vituperative comments. Fieldwork had never been this easy--here were informants seeking me out to tell me their stories! I had extensive discussions with five women, and obtained other information through discussions at presentations I gave.' This alternative "Tupperware party," or group of women allied in our discomfort, shared certain characteristics. We were university-educated, Euro-Canadian professionals, some in the academy, one outside. I noted that the most pointed c riticisms of the company came from a couple of older women who had spent their early adult years as housewives, although they later joined the ranks of academe.

When I moved to another part of Canada and started talking about Tupperware to younger Euro-Canadian university women, their reactions were quite different. The younger women were also very willing to engage in, although they did not initiate, discussions about Tupperware, but their conversation was markedly less negative and personal. These women tended to find Tupperware an object of amusement, quaint and kitschy, rather than a personal affront. The very different reactions of my two generations of friends stemmed, I suspected, from their experiences in entering the work force. The older women had been expected to be, and had in some cases been, housewives. They had had to challenge these expectations to create their professional lives. By contrast, the younger women had expected and been expected to pursue careers. My conversations with all of these women, some dozen or more, raised more questions than they could possibly answer--about women's changing work and domestic roles, about why Tupperware's image seemed so stubbornly static, about whether opinions in general were changing about Tupperware. After all, their shared characteristic--highly educated professional women--has been neither ideologically nor actually involved with the realm of Tupperware. The one exception is a distributor in Saskatchewan, who provided me with important information about how Tupperware is sold there.

In order to answer my questions, this paper involves a reading of literature by and about Tupperware against political and economic realities of women over roughly the past half century. In this I follow the lead of Martin (1994), who reads medical and popular American understandings of immunity against U.S. social, political and economic history. For her sources, Martin relays between published material and interviews both with scientists and with non-scientist members of the public. The interviews provide her with a way of discovering cultural understandings of the ideas projected by the scientific media. Here I present macrosociological information about women's economic roles over the last fifty years. This provides the context within which I then analyse company material for the image it embodies and the solutions it presents to women. Popular and academic writings about Tupperware, and to a smaller extent my conversations with women, provide a gauge of cultural perceptions of this image (2) that are the n compared to changes in the "success stories" publicized by the company. Written sources, like ethnographic studies, constitute the views of only some people, but I have searched widely through electronic and paper indexes to find a representative sample of opinion. (3) I have taken a broadly North American focus here, relying on both Canadian and American literature.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Preserving Domesticity: Reading Tupperware in Women's Changing Domestic, Social and Economic Roles
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?