Dithering Diplomacy: The Dutch and the Iraqi Crisis
Hylarides, Peter, Contemporary Review
THE war in Iraq has created an almost unbridgeable gap between the world's most important allies - the United States and Europe. The European Union is hopelessly divided with Britain firmly on the side of the US, whilst Germany and France have until recently been trying to outdo each other in America-bashing. The latter has, of course, continuously sought to play a dominant role in Europe and it is on France's bureaucratic lines that the European Union has been created. The Netherlands has played only a minor role in the Iraq crisis. It is interesting to observe, though, the position of the Dutch government in that crisis. In a previous article in Contemporary Review on the Dutch in Europe, I concluded that their attitudes towards Europe have generally been dominated by an odd mixture of national interest, dictated by mercantile concerns, and a struggle to maintain influence without incurring the wrath of other European nations. The same is true in their relations with the United States.
When the Iraq issue came to the forefront in September 2002. the Dutch government was one of the first in Europe to say that only a hard-line approach would work. The Christian Democrat (CDA) Minister of Foreign Affairs Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, a former diplomat, went even further by saying that military means would not be excluded at forehand. In an interview published in the evening newspaper NRC Handelsblad, Mr De Hoop Scheffer said, 'if consensus cannot be reached in the UN and one permanent member of the Security Council will use its veto power' (then) we must create a coalition that is not withheld by that one veto. The tone had changed a bit by November 2002 when the coalition government consisting of CDA, VVD (Liberal Democrats) and LPF (Pim Fortuyn List) was relegated to the role of caretaker after it fell a few weeks earlier.
A little over a week after the Security Council unanimously approved Resolution 1441, the Dutch government was approached by the US government through diplomatic channels to co-operate in principal with military contributions in case of military action in Iraq. During the debate in Parliament, the two main coalition parties in government, VVD (Liberal Party) and CDA (Christian Democrats) indicated that they would be in favour of military support. The main opposition party PvdA (Labour Party) pointed out that there was enough pressure on Iraq to co-operate with UN weapons inspectors. The case for possible military support was premature, as the United Nations should have the opportunity to exhaust all peaceful means to force the Iraqis to comply with Resolution 1441. Jaap de Hoop Scheffer then gave a typical Dutch reaction. Though personally in favour of increasing pressure on Iraq, he said that the government took the matter very seriously but that 'everything was still open'. 'I do not wish to go …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Dithering Diplomacy: The Dutch and the Iraqi Crisis. Contributors: Hylarides, Peter - Author. Magazine title: Contemporary Review. Volume: 282. Issue: 1649 Publication date: June 2003. Page number: 338+. © 1999 Contemporary Review Company Ltd. COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.