High Court Ruling on Forced Meds Garners Praise: Strict Limits Placed on When the Mentally Ill Can Be Medicated against Their Will. (APA's Stance Prevails)

By MacReady, Norra | Clinical Psychiatry News, July 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

High Court Ruling on Forced Meds Garners Praise: Strict Limits Placed on When the Mentally Ill Can Be Medicated against Their Will. (APA's Stance Prevails)


MacReady, Norra, Clinical Psychiatry News


Mental health clinicians are praising the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that mentally ill defendants may be forcibly medicated to make them competent to stand trial--but only after prosecutors have met strict requirements.

The justices overturned a lower court's decision permitting prosecutors to medicate an unwilling defendant, arguing that those requirements had not been met.

"The decision adopts the general standards for justifying medication to restore competence that the American Psychiatric Association urged in its amicus brief: medical appropriateness, necessity as a practical matter, likely effectiveness, [and] likely absence of fair-trial harms," Dr. Jeffrey Metzner, who chairs the association's Committee on Psychiatry and the Law, told this newspaper. "The majority decision indicates that the use of involuntary medication should only be done after exhausting other alternative involuntary procedures, such as those based on dangerousness."

Rhea Farberman, a spokesperson for the American Psychological Association, said that her organization, which also filed an amicus brief on the case, wanted the court to see that nondrug therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, for example, should be considered first.

The case of Sell v. United States involved Dr. Charles T. Sell, a St. Louis dentist with a long history of mental illness who resisted prosecutors' attempts to make him take antipsychotic medication so he could stand trial for mail fraud, Medicaid fraud, and money laundering. He has been incarcerated on the current charges since 1998. Before that, Dr. Sell had been hospitalized at least twice since 1982 after claiming, among other things, that communists had contaminated the gold he used for filling teeth, that a government agent was trying to kill him, and that he had held conversations with God.

In 1999, he was sent to the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Mo., where a reviewing psychiatrist concluded that Dr. Sell's symptoms pointed to a diagnosis of delusional disorder, with a possible underlying schizophrenic process. The psychiatrist also determined that Dr. Sell was incompetent to stand trial without antipsychotic medication. Medical center staff sought court permission for forcible medication, and Dr. Sell and his attorneys took the case to the high court.

In a 6-3 decision led by Justice Stephen Breyer, the court established four conditions prosecutors must meet to medicate defendants against their will:

* The importance of the government's case must not jeopardize the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

High Court Ruling on Forced Meds Garners Praise: Strict Limits Placed on When the Mentally Ill Can Be Medicated against Their Will. (APA's Stance Prevails)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?