The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and September 11th: Wake-Up Call to Get the Treaties Right

By Johnson, Larry D. | Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, September 29, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and September 11th: Wake-Up Call to Get the Treaties Right


Johnson, Larry D., Denver Journal of International Law and Policy


There are two international treaties currently being drafted specifically on nuclear terrorism. (1) Both could require that specific measures be taken worldwide to protect and secure nuclear facilities from terrorist attack and sabotage; but neither one does. United States' efforts to include such requirements were thwarted by some of our closest "coalition" allies before September 11th. Now is the time to revive those efforts. September 11th should have taught us some important lessons.

LESSONS OF SEPTEMBER 11TH

The first lesson is that we can no longer assume that no one "in his right mind" would commit a terrorist act for fear of dying or being exposed to dangerous ionizing radiation. It is now clear that large numbers of people are more than willing to die as martyrs for a cause. This undercuts a presumption, which up to now, played a major role behind assessments of what is required to defend nuclear materials and facilities against terrorists and sabotage.

The second lesson is drawn from the first: so-called "dirty" bombs are now more plausible. We can no longer assume that a terrorist will be deterred by concerns of self-preservation in order to build or disperse a "dirty" bomb, a conventional explosive device designed to disperse radioactivity, whether as a result of radioactive material being made a part of the device, or it being made the target of the device. For example, a bomb directed at a nuclear reactor or a spent fuel pond where "used" but highly radioactive fuel rods are cooling is a "dirty" bomb. The effects of such a "dirty" bomb would not, of course, equal the devastation of exploding a nuclear device, but its effects would be psychological and politically calamitous. In the town of Goiania in Brazil, the rupture of a radioactive "source," which had been used for medical purposes but carelessly discarded caused disruption, panic, several deaths, and hundreds of people, buildings, and large tracts of land to be contaminated. (2)

The third lesson is, what happens in other parts of the world can have a direct impact upon Americans' safety and security. While we strive to make sure our own nuclear facilities are safe from theft or sabotage, a potential terrorist might well be able to obtain material through theft or illegal purchase in other countries for delivery to our doorstep. There are technical limitations in detecting nuclear material at border locations. (3) For example, do we know how well the containers arriving at the Port of Newark are screened? The preventive approach calls for measures to make sure the material never leaves its place of origin, as we attempt to do with other material we do not want to enter the country.

Fourth, as far as terrorism treaties are concerned, they miss the mark. They focus on criminalizing the acts and punishing the terrorists, but only after the thief has let the horse out of the barn. (4) In view of the nature of this beast--dangerous radioactive material--the point should be to make sure the thief does not get anywhere near the barn. Nuclear terrorism treaties should require specific measures of prevention to make it harder for would-be terrorists to commit acts of nuclear terrorism.

WHAT'S NEEDED?

Today, there are no binding preventive measures on the international level; each country is on its own. It is the responsibility of national governments to provide for protection and security as part of their "sovereign" rights and responsibilities. (5) That does not fly after September 11th. Today, it is in our best interest to have countries thousands of miles away apply preventive measures to make it more difficult for terrorists to get their hands on this material and to inflict harm on others including our own citizens.

WHAT KIND OF "DANGEROUS" RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?

In the past, treaties and international regulation have focused on certain radioactive material considered "dangerous" because it can be used to make nuclear weapons. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and September 11th: Wake-Up Call to Get the Treaties Right
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.