Who's Attacking the Constitution? Citing the Threat of Terrorism, a Cabal of Influential Saboteurs Is Proposing Assorted Amendments That Would Destroy Our Constitutional Checks and Balances

By Jasper, William F. | The New American, August 25, 2003 | Go to article overview

Who's Attacking the Constitution? Citing the Threat of Terrorism, a Cabal of Influential Saboteurs Is Proposing Assorted Amendments That Would Destroy Our Constitutional Checks and Balances


Jasper, William F., The New American


The Continuity of Government Commission (COG) has burst onto the scene with great fanfare. Virtually unknown a year ago, its reports and press conferences now command headlines and the rapt attention of major news networks. In record time, it has launched a movement to amend the U.S. Constitution, ostensibly to correct the document's shortcomings relative to the Age of Terrorism.

It helps, of course, that the commission boasts an impressive lineup. Its honorary co-chairs are former Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Its co-chairs are former White House Counsel Lloyd Cutler and former Senator Alan Simpson. Other prominent COG members include former House Speakers Tom Foley and Newt Gingrich, Clinton Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, Reagan Chief of Staff Kenneth Duberstein, Clinton adviser and confidant Strobe Talbott, Bush Secretary of Labor Lynn Martin, Clinton Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, and NAACP President Kweisi Mfume.

The commission wields considerable clout that it is using to force-feed the American public what it claims are urgently needed remedies for the plague of terrorism. A close look at the COG proposals and the individuals and organizations behind them, however, shows that there is more cause to fear the offered cure than the potential illness. In short, the individuals leading the COG initiative and the groups backing the effort have been involved in a decades-long subversive campaign to overturn the Constitution. They are publicly on record in favor of striking down the Constitution's checks and balances and its separation of powers. Many of them have openly advocated transforming our republic into a parliamentary system similar to that of various European governments. Over the past two decades they have pushed hard for a constitutional convention (con-con) for the purpose of restructuring our government based on the parliamentary model, which would be more conducive to centralized control than our present constitutional system. Now, in this current "crisis," they are attempting to achieve piecemeal what they have failed to accomplish by their abortive con-con effort. Several pieces of legislation and several constitutional amendments have been introduced in Congress to advance the COG agenda.

Subversive Pedigree

The pedigree of the Continuity of Government Commission leads back to similar groups launched in the 1980s to help effect the radical con-con revision of the Constitution. Chief among these was the Committee on the Constitutional System (CCS). A key individual in the efforts then and now is consummate Washington insider Lloyd N. Cutler, White House counselor to Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and senior partner in the high-powered Washington, D.C., law firm of Wilmer, Cutler and Pickering. In 2002, Cutler launched the COG, which he co-chairs along with Alan Simpson, former Republican Senator of Wyoming. Twenty years earlier, in 1982, Cutler helped launch the CCS, which he co-chaired with former Treasury Secretary C. Douglas Dillon and Senator Nancy Landon Kassebaum (R-Kan).

Like COG, membership in CCS comprised a glittering array of former senators and congressmen, members of the Cabinet and White House staff, journalists, lawyers, scholars, and business and financial leaders.

Cutler helped pave the way to the formation of the CCS with an essay, entitled "To Form a Government," that appeared in the Fall 1980 issue of Foreign Affairs, the flagship journal of the Council on Foreign Relations. "In parliamentary terms," Cutler's article argued, "one might say that under the U.S. Constitution it is not now feasible to 'form a Government.' The separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches, whatever its merits in 1793, has become a structure that almost guarantees stalemate today."

Making it very clear that he favored changing our political system to a parliamentary form that joined the legislative and executive powers, Cutler advocated empowering the president "to dissolve Congress and call for new congressional elections.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Who's Attacking the Constitution? Citing the Threat of Terrorism, a Cabal of Influential Saboteurs Is Proposing Assorted Amendments That Would Destroy Our Constitutional Checks and Balances
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.