Corporate Crime after 2000: A New Law Enforcement Challenge or Deja Vu?

By Lowell, Abbe David; Arnold, Kathryn C. | American Criminal Law Review, Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

Corporate Crime after 2000: A New Law Enforcement Challenge or Deja Vu?


Lowell, Abbe David, Arnold, Kathryn C., American Criminal Law Review


INTRODUCTION

White collar crime is in vogue. Although there are investigations and prosecutions throughout the country at any given time in which individuals and businesses are charged with corporate wrongdoing, 2002 and 2003 will likely be high-water marks for such cases. The reasons for the increase are obvious. Police and prosecutors respond most quickly when there are victims of criminal wrongdoing--the greater the harm and the greater the number of victims, the greater the priority given by law enforcement. When businesses flourish, profits are high, unemployment is low, and bankruptcies are sporadic, the conduct of businesses (including misconduct) is masked by economic success. Conversely, when companies fail, markets drop, layoffs are widespread, and Chapter 11 becomes common, the conduct which caused or contributed to such failures are examined closely under the law enforcement microscope. This is such an era. Corporate crime has become a central topic on the business pages, cable channels, in periodicals, and throughout the media. Two-thousand two was the year Americans became versed in the failures that surrounded companies such as Enron Corporation, Worldcom, Inc., Adelphia Communications Corporation, Imclone Systems Inc., and Tyco International, Ltd. In 2003, the trend has continued as there are investigations concerning the financial dealings of AOL-Time Warner, Healthsouth Corp. and Tenet Healthcare, to name just a few.

It may seem as if 2002 was the most prolific era for investigations following business failures, but that is not the case. About a decade ago, there was a flurry of legislative and judicial activity concerning the failures of banks and savings and loans institutions throughout the nation. There are a number of similarities between the financial institutions crisis of a decade past and the current phenomenon of corporate failures. In both eras, regulators and law enforcement officials were criticized for being too lax before the events occurred. Then and now, elected officials incorporated the events into a dominant theme in the political landscape. Once the respective failures occurred, the law enforcement responses in both the financial institutions era and the current onslaught of corporate scandals has been massive, with some criticism that the response is an attempt to compensate for pre-failure neglect.

With respect to law enforcement's efforts now as during the Savings and Loan crisis, the question should be asked: Has the law enforcement response been effective or excessive in addressing the problem de jour? In considering that question, there is one large difference in the two different eras of business scandal and failure--the possibility of recovery for the victims of wrongdoing. Many of those adversely affected by bank and savings and loan failures enjoyed government-insured accounts and had the chance to recover the sums lost. With respect to business failures and market collapses today, there is no such insurance; the return to investors and others damaged by the business failures may be pennies on the dollar, if anything. This potential for unreimbursed loss has caused a great call for action by this era's victims, and perhaps an even greater response by law enforcement.

The impact of the current era of business failures has motivated all branches of government to react. Congress, which feels the pulse of public opinion most quickly, jumped into the fray with a new omnibus securities law containing a variety of new laws to address business crime. In addition, courts have been retooling the definition of "intent," perhaps the most essential ingredient in white collar crime charges, at the urging of prosecutors seeking a means to compel officials to answer for the actions of their businesses. Finally, agency regulators, prosecutors, and even private attorneys once again found creative avenues in all legal forums--administrative agencies, the courts, and licensing procedures--to seek redress from alleged wrongs and, in so doing, breathed new life into the law and practice of "parallel proceedings. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corporate Crime after 2000: A New Law Enforcement Challenge or Deja Vu?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.