Not Guilty,mate; Forget the [Pounds Sterling]2 Million Lawyers and the Professors of Palm Pilotry. the Case against the Kelly Defendant Has Been Heard before the Bar of British Public Opinion and Sentence Pronounced

The Mail on Sunday (London, England), September 21, 2003 | Go to article overview

Not Guilty,mate; Forget the [Pounds Sterling]2 Million Lawyers and the Professors of Palm Pilotry. the Case against the Kelly Defendant Has Been Heard before the Bar of British Public Opinion and Sentence Pronounced


Byline: ROD LIDDLE

POOR Alastair Campbell.Forced to leave the battlefield-just before the moment of perhaps his greatest ever triumph of news management. It must be galling for him.

Because, you have to say, as far as the media seems to be concerned, he has won hands down. For ten weeks public attention has been focused upon issues of the most staggering mundanity and utter lack of relevance. Minutiae so remote from the point as to be almost surreal.

Did Andrew Gilligan get a word wrong in his broadcast at seven minutes past six on May 29? What was said in the email sent by the BBC's 'Kevin Suit' to his senior colleague 'Richard Suit' on June 8? We even had an eminent Palm Pilot expert from a Department of Palm Pilot Studies examining Gilligan's electronic notebook to see if he touched it after May 21.

So what if he did, you might be asking yourself. What's that got to do with anything? More pertinently, what's it got to do with the invasion of Iraq and, more specifically, this Government's determination to wage war despite the manifest lack of a need to do so?

This has been Alastair's last, and greatest, victory. His own war against the BBC, and Andrew Gilligan in particular, has had precisely the effect intended.

Please don't doubt for a moment that Downing Street's wrath at the BBC was anything other than confected and opportunistic. A week after the crucial Gilligan broadcast, Campbell met senior news executives from the BBC - including Richard Sambrook and the editor of the Today programme - and said not a word about the Gilligan report. It was only much later Downing Street decided to get really angry about it - just as the press, public and Parliament started asking serious questions about the process which led us into the unjustifiable Iraq war.

The outrage was bogus and intended to divert attention away from the real story - a story big enough to bring down not just Campbell and Geoff Hoon, but Tony Blair too.

Luckily, evidence is growing that the British public has cottoned on.

Shortly after appearing before Lord Hutton for the latest in a series of gruelling inquisitions, Gilligan repaired to a local restaurant to recuperate. When he came to pay the bill the manager said 'you're Andrew Gilligan, aren't you? In which case, mate, there's no charge. How could we charge you?' There is more: various taxi drivers have declined to accept payment from the mild-mannered reporter, saying it is their honour to ferry him around for nothing. Strangers have been approaching him in the street to shake his hand. And if Gilligan turned up in my local pub he'd be cheered to the rafters by locals who, when you mention the word 'Campbell' or, increasingly, 'Blair', grimace, sneer or spit.

It is probably too early to say we're about to witness a nationwide outbreak of Gilliganmania, with hysterical women prostrating themselves in front of him.

But there is not much doubt where public sympathy lies.

Because even if you don't trust the anecdotal stuff, check out the astonishing result from the Brent East by-election - a Labour majority of 13,000 ripped away by some unknown Lib-Dem moppet.

AND then there are the latest opinion polls. Alastair Campbell may have managed the news: but he has not managed public opinion.

Maybe that is because we now know for certain - had we ever been in any doubt - that Campbell was instrumental in 'sexing up' the September dossier about the nature of Iraq's threat to the west. A dossier which we now know for certain - had we ever been in any doubt - was commissioned retrospectively to provide spurious justification for a decision which had already been taken by the Prime Minister months previously. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Not Guilty,mate; Forget the [Pounds Sterling]2 Million Lawyers and the Professors of Palm Pilotry. the Case against the Kelly Defendant Has Been Heard before the Bar of British Public Opinion and Sentence Pronounced
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.