Monuments in a Flood Zone: "Builders" and "Recipients" in Ancient Varendri, (Eastern India and Bangladesh)

By Panja, Sheena | Antiquity, September 2003 | Go to article overview

Monuments in a Flood Zone: "Builders" and "Recipients" in Ancient Varendri, (Eastern India and Bangladesh)


Panja, Sheena, Antiquity


Introduction

Anyone who has seen the imposing Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur in Bangladesh is filled with a sense of wonder at this towering eighth--ninth century AD monument rising above the flat Holocene terrain (Figure 1: The surrounding terrain; Figure 2: The Monument of Paharpur). The alluvial landscape of the area is interspersed with similar structural remains, although few are so magnificent as the one at Paharpur. Such monuments were constructed by the Pala kings between approximately ninth to eleventh century AD in the eastern part of India and Bangladesh in a region covering about 1200 square kilometres, the ancient name of which was Varendri (Figure 3). They have been classified on the basis of structural details and religious attributes by researchers in this domain. But given the lavish nature of the architecture and the impression it creates on a spectator in this dull, monotonous land, it makes one wonder what impact they had in the past, and for whom. Were they major landmarks, the relics of former political centres or the residences of reclusive monks?

[FIGURES 1-3 OMITTED]

According to Tilley (1994; 1996) landscapes are experienced and known through the movement of the human body in space and time. Because landscape plays such an important role in the constitution of self-identity, controlling knowledge of it may become a primary resource in the creation and reproduction of repressive power or structures of social dominance. This control could be expressed in one way, through the symbolically effective placing of monuments in the landscape. Architecture is a potent medium for controlling people; what they see and do.

There are certain limits to this view of landscape, in that all the people moving around processional routes or around monuments are taken to be universal people. The monuments have been appropriated by the archaeologist: 'me as monument' (Hodder 1999: 136). This lack of focus on individual lives is closely related to the refusal to consider specific cultural and historical meanings (Hodder 1999). Thomas's defence of the phenomenological approach is that we are entering into the same set of material relationships in which people found themselves in the past, in order to produce our own interpretations. Using our own bodies as analogues for those of the past we are seeking to "reanimate" a past world and in the process to identify the ways in which it differed from our own (Thomas 2001).

I agree that the effect is concerned with the individual experience of encountering sites, a subjective response to the landscape which has its own validity. However it seems difficult to assume that experiences will be universal; landscape and monuments represent a variety of constantly changing meanings that are determined by the light in which they are seen. Moreover certain people "built" the monuments while others are the "recipients" (Holtorf 2000), and these are likely to have different attitudes to them. Why were these monuments created by the "builders"? Were they of vital importance in the creation of authority? Did the "recipient", on the other hand, actually respond to this authority? How did they "receive" this newly created landscape? What is the difference between the experience of the "builders" and the "recipients"? People constructed monuments in a way that made sense then, much as we do today. How is the experience of contemporary urban Indian, Western-educated archaeologists like us different from the experience of the past? Whose landscape are we "experiencing" today? This article is an effort to distinguish the experience of similar landscapes by different individuals, between builders and recipients, between past and present.

The nature of the land: monsoon country

The Varendri.region, which lies in the Pleistocene Barind Formation is high, open, undulating and devoid of shade. The ground is hard and drinking water is scarce, but in autumn the country is a green expanse of winter rice. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Monuments in a Flood Zone: "Builders" and "Recipients" in Ancient Varendri, (Eastern India and Bangladesh)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.