Indicators for Safe Family Reunification: How Professionals Differ

By Karoll, Brad R.; Poertner, John | Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, September 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Indicators for Safe Family Reunification: How Professionals Differ


Karoll, Brad R., Poertner, John, Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare


Many professionals who work with substance-affected families consider the time limits prescribed by the Adoption and Safe Families Act (1997) to be unrealistically short. The high prevalence of substance use in child welfare cases requires professionals to quickly determine when it is safe to reunify children placed because of abuse or neglect in concert with this serious family problem. This exploratory study identified similarities and differences on different indicators of safe reunification between judges who hear juvenile cases, private agency child welfare caseworkers, and substance abuse counselors. The study examined these professionals' rating of the importance of each indicator. Judges, caseworkers, and counselors from a large midwestern state were surveyed. All groups agreed on the importance of 15 of the 19 identified areas of functioning. Judges and substance abuse counselors significantly differed on four factors; counselors and caseworkers differed on two. Implications of the findings for practice are discussed.

**********

The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA), in concert with the influence of alcohol- and drug-related problems on child welfare cases, has placed greater decision-making pressure on judges who hear juvenile cases, child welfare caseworkers, and substance abuse counselors serving this population. ASFA shortened the time for making permanency decisions to 12 months. This has resulted in judges who hear juvenile cases, child welfare professionals, and substance abuse counselors suggesting that the renewed emphasis on moving children to a safe and permanent home in a short period of time greatly challenges parents with substance use disorders (Semidei, Radel, & Nolan, 2001).

Rationale for the study

The increased pressure is partially attributable to the greater number of cases identified as involving parents with substance use disorders. For example, an investigation of the relationships among childhood abuse, subsequent adult functioning, and child placement with a sample of low-income, urban African American mothers reported substance use disorders highly correlated with child placement (Marcenko, Kemp, & Larson, 2000). Others have reported that 40% to 80% of all child welfare abuse and neglect cases involved parental substance use disorders (Young, Gardner, & Dennis, 1998). In consideration of the large number of child welfare cases involving substance-affected parents, the question is "How do key decision-makers weigh indicators for safe reunification with substance-affected parents?"

Literature review

Providing services for parents with substance use disorders is challenging. Recovery is an ongoing process beset with formidable tasks and multiple pitfalls and setbacks (Brown & Lewis, 1999; DiClemente & Prochaska, 1998; Leshner, 1997; Meyer, 1996; Miller, Gorski, & Miller, 1992). Family reunification only increases pressure by adding responsibilities recovering parents are expected to take on (Hohman & Butt, 2001). Developing healthy recovery from alcohol and drug use disorders in concert with learning skills necessary for effective parenting is difficult, and parents, primarily women, face innumerable challenges.

The literature suggests that parenting mothers recovering from alcohol and drug use disorders face multiple challenges including systemic obstacles, negative social attitudes, and traumatic personal histories. Systemic problems may include the potential conflict resulting from who is treated as the client (Karoll & Poertner, 2002a), child welfare workers' lack of skills, knowledge, or experience in working with substance-affected parents (Hess & Folaron, 1991; van Wormer, 1995), or poverty (Dore & Doris, 1997; Freundlich, 1997). Many substance-affected parenting women are financially or psychologically dependent on abusive or drug using partners (Miller & Cervantes, 1997).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Indicators for Safe Family Reunification: How Professionals Differ
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?