The Real Reason We Should All Celebrate 2001; This Week Is the 200th Anniversary of the Creation of the United Kingdom. So Why Has Nobody Noticed?

Daily Mail (London), January 2, 2001 | Go to article overview

The Real Reason We Should All Celebrate 2001; This Week Is the 200th Anniversary of the Creation of the United Kingdom. So Why Has Nobody Noticed?


Byline: CORRELLI BARNETT

YESTERDAY, Australians celebrated in magnificent and proud style the 100th anniversary of the Act of Federation which turned separate colonies into a unified nation state.

Church bells rang out across the country, carnival crowds swarmed the streets, fireworks burst in glory across the southern sky.

Yesterday also marked the 200th anniversary of the culminating act in the long historical process of creating our own United Kingdom of Great Britain.

It was on January 1, 1801, that the Act of Union came into effect.

By this Act, Ireland, which hitherto had its own home-rule parliament in Dublin (if one controlled by a small, unrepresentative Protestant elite), became an integrated part of the United Kingdom along with Scotland and Wales.

All political power in the British Isles was henceforth centred in Westminster. The building of the British nation state was complete.

Yet did we mark this tremendous event?

Where were our fireworks and carnivals to celebrate? The answer is nowhere. Our 'New Labour' Government was either totally unaware (in its vaunted ignorance of our history) of the 200th anniversary or, even worse, chose to ignore it out of contempt for Britain's past.

After all, this is a time when the Blairites are working away insidiously to dilute the sovereignty of the British state. They have already dispersed sovereignty downwards to a Scottish parliament, a Welsh assembly and a Northern Ireland executive which contains inveterate enemies of Britain.

They are in the process of yielding sovereignty upwards to European institutions which bear more than a passing resemblance to Bonaparte's political and economic 'Continental System' which the then newly unified British state successfully wrecked at Trafalgar in 1805 and at Waterloo in 1815.

Yet perhaps the real reason why the Government has utterly ignored the 200th anniversary of the Act of Union is because that Act marked the culminating success of the English ruling elite in creating the British state and the British national identity as we now know it.

For today's Britain and its great state institutions are (with the exception of the Scottish legal and education systems) simply those of England writ large. The Queen is entitled Elizabeth II, though Scotland, unlike England, never had an Elizabeth I.

The United Kingdom Parliament at Westminster is a straight continuation of English constitutional development from the Middle Ages through to the 18th century.

British military institutions are a development of 17th century English institutions, even if the Army includes Scots, Welsh and Irish regiments.

Today's Royal Navy traces its descent directly from the Elizabethan Royal Navy which sank the ambitions of Philip II of Spain. An admiral's flag remains the flag of England: the cross of St George.

Even the White Ensign consists of the English flag, with the Union Flag in the upper quartile.

And Nelson at Trafalgar did not signal 'Britain expects . . .' but 'England expects . . .' All this no more than manifests a historical truth - that 'Britain' was made by a series of ruthlessly effective English takeovers, all with the purpose of making the realm of England politically and militarily secure.

Wales was the first to succumb, beaten into submission by English armies in the 13th century. Scotland was next to fall to English domination.

When James VI of Scotland also became James I of England in 1603, the two kingdoms remained separate, with their own parliaments, though under one monarchy.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Real Reason We Should All Celebrate 2001; This Week Is the 200th Anniversary of the Creation of the United Kingdom. So Why Has Nobody Noticed?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.