Nasty and Cynical Social Meddling; COMMENTARY

Daily Mail (London), February 8, 2001 | Go to article overview

Nasty and Cynical Social Meddling; COMMENTARY


Byline: ANTHONY O'HEAR

OUR leading universities are rightly valued for their contribution to our national life. They are institutions devoted to teaching and research into the best that has been thought and known. Subjects like maths, physics, the other sciences, literature and philosophy are studied there for their own sake, because they are worthwhile in themselves and also because they enhance any society in which they flourish.

Universities are also places where young people are educated to the highest standards for vital professions like medicine, engineering and the law.

Above all, they are devoted to expanding the minds of those qualified and able to benefit from intellectual work at the highest level.

To achieve their goals, universities need to be able to teach and research in an atmosphere of free inquiry and they need to maintain the highest standards.

This means they must have the freedom to select their students as they see fit: that is, on strictly academic grounds.

But this would be impossible if recommendations from yesterday's report by the Commons Education Sub-Committee are carried out. Indeed, rarely have I seen such a nasty and fundamentally dishonest piece of work.

If its proposals are accepted, it will completely alter the nature of universities.

The report cynically couches its recommendations in a language calculated to obscure what is actually proposed and simply ignores the main problems faced by universities and the evidence which would show that its proposals are simply irrelevant.

Under its proposals, universities will no longer be places of free inquiry, teaching and researching freely. Instead, they will become agents of central government, enacting its misguided projects of social engineering, with threats to those universities which fail to comply.

All this amounts to postcode prejudice. For, if the committee has its way, each university will be forced to take a given proportion of its students from areas of the country designated as being particularly disadvantaged.

In 35 years of studying and working at universities, I have never known any academic discriminating against a well qualified person on grounds of their social background.

QUITE the contrary; most academics in the top universities will do anything they can to help deserving cases from disadvantaged backgrounds, so long as it is done on merit and without compromising standards.

But then the MPs are not interested in what actually happens. Nor are they interested in what universities stand for.

Instead, without a shred of argument and on nothing more than egalitarian dogma, they simply assume there is something wrong with a university whose students do not come equally from all sections of society.

And while they declare themselves against quotas to equalise university populations across social class, they recommend that 'all higher education institutions should establish and make public their targets for a range of access performance indicators'. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Nasty and Cynical Social Meddling; COMMENTARY
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.