Why I Now Believe Breast Screening Is a Waste of Time BY THE PROFESSOR WHO PIONEERED IT

Daily Mail (London), March 1, 1999 | Go to article overview

Why I Now Believe Breast Screening Is a Waste of Time BY THE PROFESSOR WHO PIONEERED IT


Byline: PROFESSOR MICHAEL BAUM

FOR ME, one of the saddest events of 1998 was the death of Linda McCartney from breast cancer. Linda stands as the representative of the hundreds of women with the disease who attend my clinics each year, and the thousands who die from it nationwide.

She lived an enviably healthy lifestyle, her disease was caught early, and she received the best treatment, both orthodox and complementary, that money could buy. And yet she died.

Following her death, the call went out once again for women to be made more aware of this disease through health education, and for more and better breast screening, both of which would aid early diagnosis.

If only it was that easy.

The truth, I'm afraid, is that the public and political responses to the breast cancer epidemic so far have been largely pointless, and patronising to women everywhere.

On the one hand, we have breast cancer awareness campaigns full of alarming and essentially meaningless statistics. On the other hand, there are the false

reassurances that if women practice self-examination of their breasts - checking each month for lumps - and so catch it early, everything will be all right.

Then there is the NHS breast screening programme, which offers mammography - breast X-rays to every woman aged between 50 and 64 every three years.

I was one of the architects of the much-heralded programme set up in 1987 and there is no doubt that it has indirectly raised standards of breast cancer treatment nationally and is likely to have a modest impact on deaths from breast cancer.

BUT today I believe that breast screening may not be the best use of scarce NHS resources available to combat this disease.

The screening programme which costs [pounds sterling]35 milion annually is limiting funds for the introduction of new drug treatments, which is where real hope for conquering breast cancer lies.

Respecting women as I do, I feel a sense of indignation that they are being sold such simplistic solutions as those outlined above to the problem of breast cancer.

Let us, for once, face the facts.

For example, take the one in 12 statistic used by breast cancer awareness campaigns to describe the incidence of the disease. It is true; but unhelpful and unnecessarily alarming.

The one in 12 figure applies to the cumulative incidence over a lifetime of a woman who lives to be 85 - not one in 12 women regardless of their age group. Of the women who develop breast cancer, over half will live out their normal life expectancy - with the result that, ultimately, one in 26 women will die of the disease.

Twenty-five out of 26 women will die of other health hazards, such as heart disease and lung cancer.

The emphasis that doctors and health educators place on early detection is also problematic.

'Early' is a chronological word but it is used to mean small in the case of a breast tumour.

Yet the disease varies widely in the way it develops and the rate at which it progresses. At one extreme it can take just six weeks to grow from one cell to a lump of one centimetre; at the other, it may take six years to reach the same size.

The majority of breast cancers

are, in fact, slow growing, and by the time a woman can detect a lump it has been there several years and her chances of recovery are predetermined. The good tumours will be cured and the bad tumours not, regardless of how early or late they were detected. Of course this is an uncomfortable fact, but it is a fact.

It is also a fact that three large-scale studies have shown that intensive instruction for women showing them how to check their breasts for suspicious lumps does not lead to a fall in deaths from breast cancer.

What it does do is double the number of false alarms and unnecessary operations to remove breast tissue for examination. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why I Now Believe Breast Screening Is a Waste of Time BY THE PROFESSOR WHO PIONEERED IT
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.