MASSACRE BY MACHETE; Torture, Rape and Mutilation Were Rife in Britain's Bloodiest Ever Colonial War, against the Mau Mau in Kenya. Yet, Disturbingly, Many of the Abuses Were Perpetrated by British Forces. Now, Kenyans Are Seeking Retribution - So What Is the Truth about This Dark Chapter from Our Past?

Daily Mail (London), December 11, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

MASSACRE BY MACHETE; Torture, Rape and Mutilation Were Rife in Britain's Bloodiest Ever Colonial War, against the Mau Mau in Kenya. Yet, Disturbingly, Many of the Abuses Were Perpetrated by British Forces. Now, Kenyans Are Seeking Retribution - So What Is the Truth about This Dark Chapter from Our Past?


Byline: DAVID ANDERSON

PEOPLE said that the Mau Mau severed the limbs of their victims, then drank their blood. Peter Mungai, an African Christian, never saw blood being drunk but he witnessed something more terrifying.

When the Mau Mau caught up with him one warm Kenyan night more than 40 years ago, they didn't harm him - not physically, at least. They just forced him to watch as they slowly strangled his closest friend and then bludgeoned him with a machete. Next, the Mau Mau gang leader cut off his dead friend's finger and forced Peter to kiss it. He was so repulsed that he vomited.

So did other acquaintances of the dead man who were forced to join in the macabre ritual. It was the Mau Mau's way of intimidating fellow Kenyans to support their cause for independence from Britain.

As an alternative means of intimidation, the Mau Mau left dismembered corpses where they would be chanced upon by those they wanted to ter-rorise - 'strung up like pigs', as one young British soldier recalled.

Walking along a forest path one beautiful morning, the soldier found the body of an African man, about the same age as himself, spiked on the branches of a tree.

The man's throat was cut, his wrists were slit and his tongue was cut out.

This was how the Mau Mau treated informers.

Another British officer described how he and his patrol were woken at dawn on their first morning in a battalion camp near Thika, in Kenya's Highlands, by a commotion of worried voices.

He went to investigate and found his men staring in horror at the body of an African, chopped up - 'as if butchered on a slab' - and hung in pieces on the perimeter fence.

The Mau Mau had left their calling card with a chilling message to anyone who opposed them: next time it could be you.

NO WAR of independence was more brutal than the battle in Kenya against the Mau Mau in the Fifties. This was Britain's dirtiest war of decolonisation.

Its history is a catalogue of terror, abuse and excess.

Despite the horrors perpetrated by the Mau Mau, neither side emerges with glory.

During the 'Emergency', as the fighting was termed, the Mau Mau slaughtered 32 European settlers on their farms in isolated rural districts, as well as murdering more than 2,000 Africans who they deemed 'collaborators'.

But security forces killed more than 10,000 rebels, and that's the official figure - the true number may be closer to 20,000. In no other British territory this century was there such a death toll.

ONLY now is the true story coming to light.

In the past few weeks, a group styling themselves the Real Mau Mau Freedom Fighters have announced plans to mount a prosecution against the British Government, claiming that our security forces committed human rights abuses in the Fifties.

They want reparations for alleged 'war crimes' against the Mau Mau and their supporters during the State of Emergency that lasted from 1952 to 1960.

Distressing as it is to admit it, the truth is that the historical record contains much that can support their claims. British behaviour during this dark period was questionable at best.

Equally, there is no doubt that the Mau Mau's atrocities against their own people were more barbaric than anything the British had encountered.

To understand this conflict and our dubious role in it, we have to return to colonial Kenya, in the days when it was known as 'the White Man's Country', where Europeans first settled in the early years of the century. By the Fifties, the second generation of settlers was farming the land, and considered Kenya their home.

The land they farmed, however, had once belonged to the Kikuyu people of the central Highlands. After the Second World War, a number of Kikuyu took up arms against the British after tiring of the administration's delays over claims for the restitution of their land.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

MASSACRE BY MACHETE; Torture, Rape and Mutilation Were Rife in Britain's Bloodiest Ever Colonial War, against the Mau Mau in Kenya. Yet, Disturbingly, Many of the Abuses Were Perpetrated by British Forces. Now, Kenyans Are Seeking Retribution - So What Is the Truth about This Dark Chapter from Our Past?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?